Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T11:37:27.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A proposed framework using systems engineering to design human-centric manufacturing systems for novel products to reduce complexity and risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2024

Malin Hane Hagström  and
Dag Bergsjö
Malin Hane Hagström*
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Dag Bergsjö
Affiliation:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
*
hanem@chalmers.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The environment for powertrain production system engineers is changing radically. This initial prescriptive study proposes a systems engineering framework based on two previous case studies which are under review for publication concerning design of battery plants. The framework was developed based on ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 standard using Concept of Operations and Model-Based Systems Engineering in a workshop setting, with a focus on visualisation to understand the practical and emotional needs of the humans in the system. The framework was validated by twelve senior project members.

Keywords

industry 5.0model-based systems engineering (MBSE)cyber-physical systemsdesign support system
Type
Systems Engineering and Design
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 4: DESIGN 2024 , May 2024 , pp. 2595 - 2604
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2024.

References

Akundi, A., Euresti, D., Luna, S., Ankobiah, W., Lopes, A., & Edinbarough, I. (2022). State of Industry 5.0; Analysis and Identification of Current Research Trends. Applied System Innovation, 5(1), 27. https://www.mdpi.com/2571-5577/5/1/27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arista, R., Zheng, X., Lu, J., & Mas, F. (2023). An ontology-based engineering system to support aircraft manufacturing system design [Article]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 68, 270-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.02.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellgran, M. (2003). Design wisdom of production system designers. Proceedings of the 5th European Academy of Design Conference.Google Scholar
Bellgran, M., & Säfsten, K. (2009). Production development: Design and Operation of Production Systems. Springer.Google Scholar
Blessing, L., & Chakrabati, A. (2009). DRM, a Design Research Methodology (1st ed.). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, C., Isaksson, O., Eckert, C., Coeckelbergh, M., & Hane Hagström, M. (2020). Data Fairy in Engineering Land: The Magic of Data Analysis as a Sociotechnical Process in Engineering Companies. Journal of Mechanical Design, 142(12), 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hane Hagström, M. (2021). Demystifying the effectiveness in design of production systems – Investigating the coupling between acquisition and maintenance of equipment. Chalmers University of Technology. https://research.chalmers.se/en/publication/526962Google Scholar
INCOSE. (2015). INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.Google Scholar
INCOSE. (2020). Systems engineering vision. Systems Engineering Vision Working Group of the International Council on Systems Engineering INCOSE.Google Scholar
Islam, M. H., Chavez, Z., Birkie, S. E., & Bellgran, M. (2020). Key Factors on Utilizing the Production System Design Phase for Increasing Operational Performance. Advances in Production Management Systems. Towards Smart and Digital Manufacturing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO.org. (2023). ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2023(en). Systems and software engineering — System life cycle processes.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC/IEEE (2006) International Standard - Systems and Software Engineering - Life Cycle Processes - Risk Management," in Std ISO IEC 16085 - 2006 , vol., no., pp.1-46Google Scholar
Ito, A., Hagström, M., Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Nawcki, M., Gandhi, K., Bergsjö, D., & Bärring, M. (2022). Improved root cause analysis supporting resilient production systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 64, 468-478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapurch, S. J. (2010). NASA systems engineering handbook. Diane Publishing.Google Scholar
Li, D., Fast-Berglund, Å., & Paulin, D. (2019). Current and future Industry 4.0 capabilities for information and knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105(9), 3951-3963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03942-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manzetti, S., & Mariasiu, F. (2015). Electric vehicle battery technologies: From present state to future systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 51, 1004-1012. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheard, S., Cook, S., Honour, E., Hybertson, D., Krupa, J., McEver, J., & White, …, B. (2015). A complexity primer for systems engineers. INCOSE Complex Systems Working Group White Paper, 1(1), 1-10.Google Scholar
Stark, R., Kind, S., & Neumeyer, S. (2017). Innovations in digital modelling for next generation manufacturing system design. Cirp Annals – Manufacturing Technology, 66, 169-172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, D. G. (2003). The mechanical design process. McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D., & Yang, M. C. (2020). Product Design and Development. McGraw Hill Education.Google Scholar
Vielhaber, M., & Stoffels, P. (2014). Product Development vs. Production Development. Procedia CIRP.Google Scholar
Weyer, S., Schmitt, M., Ohmer, M., & Gorecky, D. (2015). Towards Industry 4.0 – Standardization as the crucial challenge for highly modular, multi-vendor production systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 48(3), 579-584. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.143CrossRefGoogle Scholar