Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T13:14:28.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Main Characteristics of Adaptive Façades

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

M. P. Voigt ,
D. Roth  and
M. Kreimeyer
M. P. Voigt*
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
D. Roth
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
M. Kreimeyer
Affiliation:
University of Stuttgart, Germany
*
michael.voigt@iktd.uni-stuttgart.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Adaptive façades (AF), unlike conventional façades, respond to their environment to reduce energy consumption while increasing comfort. The planning of AF presents architects and engineers with a variety of challenges. One central challenge is the specification of the right planning goals in the early phases. This paper identifies in a systematic literature review the main characteristics which were crucial in previous realizations of AF. Due to the comprehensive approach it provides a reference for the goal definition of subsequent projects and the development of further methodical support.

Keywords

architectural designrequirements managementcharacteristics and propertiesadaptive facadesliterature review
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 2543 - 2552
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Addington, D.M. and Schodek, D.L. (2005), Smart materials and technologies: For the architecture and design professions, Reprint, Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Aelenei, D., Aelenei, L. and Vieira, C.P. (2016), “Adaptive Façade: Concept, Applications, Research Questions”, Energy Procedia, Vol. 91, pp. 269–275. 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Dakheel, J. and Tabet Aoul, K. (2017), “Building Applications, Opportunities and Challenges of Active Shading Systems: A State-of-the-Art Review”, Energies, Vol. 10 No. 10. 10.3390/en10101672Google Scholar
Al-Obaidi, K.M., Azzam Ismail, M., Hussein, H. and Abdul Rahman, A.M. (2017), “Biomimetic building skins: An adaptive approach”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 79, pp. 1472–1491. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonucci, D., Pasut, W., Babich, F., Avesani, S. and Roman, G. (2021), KPI Database [online] Institute for renewable energy. Available at: http://kpidb.eurac.edu/kpi (accessed 24 June 2021).Google Scholar
Attia, S., Bilir, S., Safy, T., Struck, C., Loonen, R. et al. . (2018), “Current trends and future challenges in the performance assessment of adaptive façade systems”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 179, pp. 165–182. 10.1016/J.ENBUILD.2018.09.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attia, S. (2018b), “Challenges and Future Directions of Smart Sensing and Control Technology for Adaptive Facades Monitoring”, in Andreas Luible and Susanne Gosztonyi (Eds.), Adaptive Facades Network Final Conference, pp. 504–515.Google Scholar
Basarir, B. (2017), “A Classification Approach for Adaptive Façades”, ICBEST Istanbul: Interdisciplinary Perspectives for Future Building Envelopes. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/33832160/A_Classification_Approach_for_Adaptive_Fa%C3%A7ades (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar
Basińska, M. (2017), “The use of multi-criteria optimization to choose solutions for energy-efficient buildings”, Bulletin of the Polish Academy of Sciences Technical Sciences, Vol. 65 No. 6, pp. 815–826. 10.1515/bpasts-2017-0084Google Scholar
Battisti, A., Persiani, S.G.L. and Crespi, M. (2019), “Review and Mapping of Parameters for the Early Stage Design of Adaptive Building Technologies through Life Cycle Assessment Tools”, Energies, Vol. 12 No. 9. 10.3390/en12091729Google Scholar
Bedon, C., Honfi, D., Kozłowski, M., Machalická, K.V., Santos, F., et al. . (2018), “Key Structural Aspects for Adaptive Facades - Activity Progress from the EU-COST Action TU1403 ‘Structural’ Task Group”, International Journal of Structural Glass and Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 135–154. 10.3844/sgamrsp.2018.135.154Google Scholar
Bedon, C., Honfi, D., Machalická, K.V., Eliášová, M., Vokáč, M. et al. . (2019), “Structural characterisation of adaptive facades in Europe – Part I: Insight on classification rules, performance metrics and design methods”, Journal of Building Engineering, Vol. 25. 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandini, L., Haase, W., Weidner, S., Böhm, M., Burghardt, T., Roth, D., Binz, H., Sawodny, O., and Sobek, W.. “Der Demonstrator D1244: Das Weltweit Erste Adaptive Hochhaus.” Bautechnik, 2022. 10.1002/bate.202100065.Google Scholar
Blessing, L.T. and Chakrabarti, A. (2009), DRM, a Design Research Methodology, Springer London, London. 10.1007/978-1-84882-587-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeke, J., Knaack, U. and Hemmerling, M. (2019), “Superposition matrix for the assessment of performance-relevant adaptive façade functions”, Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, Vol 7, No 2, pp. 1–20. 10.7480/JFDE.2019.2.2463Google Scholar
Böke, J., Knaack, U. and Hemmerling, M. (2020), “Automated adaptive façade functions in practice - Case studies on office buildings”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 113. 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fassbender, E., Hemmerle, C. and Muhr, N. (2021), “Multi Criteria Design and Decision Support for Solar and Green Envelopes”, Proceedings of the Powerskin Conference, München, pp. 127–140.Google Scholar
Favoino, F. (Ed.) (2018), Building performance simulation and characterization of adaptive facades: Adaptive facade network, TU Delft Open, Delft. ISBN: 978-94-6366-111-9Google Scholar
Fox, M.A. and Yeh, B.P. (2000), “Intelligent Kinetic Systems in Architecture”, in Nixon, P. (Ed.), Managing interactions in smart environments: 1st International Workshop on Managing Interactions in Smart Environments, Springer, London, pp. 91–103. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0743-9_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frighi, V. (2021), Smart Architecture: A Sustainable Approach for Transparent Building Components Design, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-030-77606-0Google Scholar
Gosztonyi, S. (2018), “The Role of Geometry for Adaptability: Comparison of Shading Systems and Biological Role Models”, Journal of Facade Design and Engineering: Special Issue FAÇADE 2018 – Adaptive!, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 163–174. 10.7480/JFDE.2018.3.2574Google Scholar
Matin, Heidari, and Eydgahi, N., A. (2019), “Technologies used in responsive facade systems: a comparative study”, Intelligent Buildings International, pp. 1–20. 10.1080/17508975.2019.1577213Google Scholar
Herzog, T. and Krippner, R. (2004), Fassaden-Atlas, De Gruyter, Basel. ISBN: 9783764370312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heusler, W. (2013), “Bewegung in der Gebäudehülle? Gegenüberstellung passiver und aktiver Konzepte”, Stahlbau, Vol. 82 No. S1, pp. 281–291. 10.1002/stab.201390071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heusler, W. (2019), “A typology of adaptive facades”, in Schumacher, M., Vogt, M.-M. and Cordón Krumme, L.A. (Eds.), New MOVE, De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, pp. 54–57. 10.1515/9783035613629-017">10.1515/9783035613629-017Google Scholar
Jin, Q. and Overend, M. (2014), “Sensitivity of façade performance on early-stage design variables”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 77, pp. 457–466. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.03.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juaristi, M., Gómez-Acebo, T. and Monge-Barrio, A. (2018), “Qualitative analysis of promising materials and technologies for the design and evaluation of Climate Adaptive Opaque Façades”, Building and Environment, Vol. 144, pp. 482–501. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juaristi, M., Konstantinou, T., Gómez-Acebo, T. and Monge-Barrio, A. (2020a), “Development and Validation of a Roadmap to Assist the Performance-Based Early-Stage Design Process of Adaptive Opaque Facades”, Sustainability, Vol. 12 No. 23, pp. 1–27. 10.3390/su122310118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juaristi, M., Loonen, R., Isaia, F., Gómez-Acebo, T. and Monge-Barrio, A. (2020b), “Dynamic Climate Analysis for early design stages: a new methodological approach to detect preferable Adaptive Opaque Façade Responses”, Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 60. 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassem, M. and Mitchell, D. (2015), “Bridging the gap between selection decisions of facade systems at the early design phase: Issues, challenges and solutions”, in Klein, T. and Knaack, U. (Eds.), Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, pp. 165–183. 10.3233/FDE-150037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, G. and Raheja, G. (2016), “Design Determinants of Building Envelope for Sustainable Built Environment: A Review”, International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, Vol. 3 No. 2. 10.11113/ijbes.v3.n2.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuru, A., Oldfield, P., Bonser, S. and Fiorito, F. (2019), “Biomimetic adaptive building skins: Energy and environmental regulation in buildings”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 205. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109544Google Scholar
Loonen, R., Hoes, P.-J. and Hensen, J. (2014a), Performance prediction of buildings with Responsive Building Elements: Challenges and Solutions, Proceedings of the 2014 Building Simulation and Optimization Conference, London. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263426725_Performance_prediction_of_buildings_with_Responsive_Building_Elements_Challenges_and_Solutions (accessed 24 February 2021).Google Scholar
Loonen, R., Rico-Martinez, J.M., Favoino, F., Brzezicki, M., Menezo, C., et al. . (2015), “Design for façade adaptability: Towards a unified and systematic characterization”, 10th Conference on Advanced Building Skins, Bern, Switserland, pp. 1284–1294.Google Scholar
Loonen, R., Singaravel, S., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D. and Hensen, J. (2014b), “Simulation-based support for product development of innovative building envelope components”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 45, pp. 86–95. 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loonen, R., Trčka, M., Cóstola, D. and Hensen, J. (2013), “Climate adaptive building shells: State-of-the-art and future challenges”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 25, pp. 483–493. 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopez, M., Rubio, R., Martın, S., Croxford, B., Jackson, R., et al. . (2015), “Active materials for adaptive architectural envelopes based on plant adaptation principles”, Journal of Facade Design and Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 27–38. 10.3233/FDE-150026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankins, J.C. (2009), “Technology readiness assessments: A retrospective”, Acta Astronautica, Vol. 65 No. 9-10, pp. 1216–1223. 10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matin, N.H., Eydgahi, A. and Shyu, S. (2017), “Comparative Analysis of Technologies Used in Responsive Building Facades”, 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, available at: https://peer.asee.org/comparative-analysis-of-technologies-used-in-responsive-building-facades.Google Scholar
Mols, T., Blumberga, A. and Karklina, I. (2017), “Evaluation of climate adaptive building shells: multi-criteria analysis”, Energy Procedia, Vol. 128, pp. 292–296. 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa, C.E. and Capeluto, I.G. (2009), “Advice tool for early design stages of intelligent facades based on energy and visual comfort approach”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 480–488. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2008.11.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiselberg, Per (Ed.) (2012), ECBCS Annex 44: Integrating Environmentally Responsive Elements in Buildings, Project Summary Report, AECOM Ltd.Google Scholar
Piroozfar, P., Farr, E.R., Hvam, L., Robinson, D. and Shafiee, S. (2019), “Configuration platform for customisation of design, manufacturing and assembly processes of building façade systems: A building information modelling perspective”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 106.Google Scholar
Ramzy, N. and Fayed, H. (2011), “Kinetic systems in architecture: New approach for environmental control systems and context-sensitive buildings”, Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 1 No. 3, pp. 170–177. 10.1016/j.scs.2011.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schade, J., Olofsson, T. and Schreyer, M. (2011), “Decision-making in a model-based design process”, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 371–382. 10.1080/01446193.2011.552510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, M., Marmullaku, D. and Boeckmann, O. (2021), “Facade-integrated adsorption system for solar cooling of lightweight buildings”, Paris.Google Scholar
Sobek, W., Haase, W. and Teuffel, P. (2000), “Adaptive Systeme”, Stahlbau, Vol. 69 No. 7, pp. 544–555. 10.1002/stab.200001870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soudian, S. and Berardi, U. (2021), “Development of a performance-based design framework for multifunctional climate-responsive façades”, Energy and Buildings, Vol. 231, pp. 1–19. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabadkani, A., Roetzel, A., Li, H.X. and Tsangrassoulis, A. (2021), “Design approaches and typologies of adaptive facades: A review”, Automation in Construction, Vol. 121. 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taveres-Cachat, E., Grynning, S., Thomsen, J. and Selkowitz, S. (2019), “Responsive building envelope concepts in zero emission neighborhoods and smart cities - A roadmap to implementation”, Building and Environment, Vol. 149, pp. 446–457. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.12.045Google Scholar
Velasco, R., Brakke, A.P. and Chavarro, D. (2015), “Dynamic Façades and Computation: Towards an Inclusive Categorization of High Performance Kinetic Façade Systems”, in Celani, G., Sperling, D.M. and Franco, J.M.S. (Eds.), Computer-Aided Architectural Design Futures. The Next City - New Technologies and the Future of the Built Environment, Vol. 527, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 172–191. 10.1007/978-3-662-47386-3_10Google Scholar
Voigt, M., Roth, D. and Binz, H. (2021), “Challenges with adaptive facades - a life cycle perspective.”, 16th Advanced Building Skins Conference & Expo, Bern, pp. 459–468.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Beltran, L. and Kim, J. (2012), “From Static to Kinetic: A Review of Acclimated Kinetic Building Envelopes”, Proceedings ASES Annual Conference, Raleigh, NC, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Yoon, J. (2018), “Climate-adaptive Facade Design with Smart Materials: Evaluation and Strategies of Thermo-responsive Smart Material Applications for Building Skins in Seoul”, PLEA 2018: Smart and Healthy Within the Two-Degree Limit, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Yoon, J. (2020), “Design-to-fabrication with thermo-responsive shape memory polymer applications for building skins”, Architectural Science Review, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Zavadskas, E.K., Antucheviciene, J., Šaparauskas, J. and Turskis, Z. (2013), “Multi-criteria Assessment of Facades’ Alternatives: Peculiarities of Ranking Methodology”, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 57, pp. 107–112. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X., Shen, J., Lu, Y., He, W., Xu, P., et al. . (2015), “Active Solar Thermal Facades (ASTFs): From concept, application to research questions”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 50, pp. 32–63. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.108CrossRefGoogle Scholar