No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Into the wonder – exploring the design of playables
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 May 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
This paper explores the concept of 'playables,' defined as tangible objects intentionally designed for immersive play, distinct from traditional utilitarian objects. It delves into how playables, unlike everyday items, transcend functionality, fostering creativity and curiosity in immersive play. It explores how playables differ from acknowledged design principles, drawing upon Dieter Rams and Don Norman. By recognizing the need for distinct design perspectives for playables, the paper contributes to unlocking their potential to enable wonder in immersive play experiences.
- Type
- Industrial Design
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2024.
References
Caillois, R. (1961). Man, Play and Games (M. Barash, Trans.). Free Press of Glencoe. New York.Google Scholar
Cankaya, O., Rohatyn-Martin, N., Leach, J., Taylor, K., & Bulut, O. (2023). Preschool Children's Loose Parts Play and the Relationship to Cognitive Development: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Intelligence, 11(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11080151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cziksentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow – The Psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fails, J. A., Druin, A., Guha, M. L., Chipman, G., Simms, S., & Churaman, W. (2005). Child's play: A comparison of desktop and physical interactive environments. Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109540.1109547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heljakka, K. (2019). Toys and Universal Guidelines for Design: A Designerly Perspective on Playability of Character Toys. Proceedings of Universal Design Bangkok.Google Scholar
Koeffel, C., Hochleitner, W., Leitner, J., Haller, M., Geven, A., & Tscheligi, M. (2010). Using Heuristics to Evaluate the Overall User Experience of Video Games and Advanced Interaction Games. In Bernhaupt, R. (Ed.), Evaluating User Experience in Games: Concepts and Methods (pp. 233–256). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-963-3_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legaard, J. F. (2022). CRISPI - A Model for Designing Toys That Facilitate Immersive Play Experiences. The International Journal of Designed Objects, 16(2), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1379/CGPCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legaard, J. F. (2023). The wonder of play. International Journal of Play, 12(3), 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/21594937.2023.2239562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legaard, J. F., & Skovbjerg, H. M. (2023). Affordances of construction toys. The Design Journal, 26(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2023.2265183Google Scholar
Norman, D. (2006). Interaction design is still an art form: Ergonomics is real engineering. Interactions, 13, 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/1109069.1109097Google Scholar
Norman, D. (1999). Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/301153.301168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User Centered System Design; New Perspectives on Human-Computer Interaction. L. Erlbaum Associates Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Ortony, A. (2006). Designers and Users: Two Perspectives on Emotion and Design. In Bagnara, S. & Smith, G. C. (Eds.), Theories and Practice in Interaction Design (0 ed., pp. 125–138). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482269536-15Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. S., & LaPoint, J. D. (1980). The Phenomenon of Play: A Multi-Dimensional Definition. Recreational Sports Journal, 5(1), 6–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/nirsa.5.1.6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rams, D. (1976). Ten principles of good design. Available at: https://www.vitsoe.com/us/about/good-design (accessed 17.07.2023).Google Scholar
Storli, R., Beate, E., Sandseter, H., & Sando, O. J. (2020). Children's Involvement in Free Play and the Use of Play Materials in the Outdoor Early Childhood Education and Care Environment. In Children, Youth and Environments (Vol. 30, Issue 1, pp. 66–82). http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublication?journalCode=chilyoutenviGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, P., Johnson, D., & Wyeth, P. (2012). Revisiting the GameFlow Model with Detailed Heuristics. Journal of Creative Technologies, 3, 1–16.Google Scholar
The Toy Association. (2023). Toy inventor and designer guide. Available at: https://www.toyassociation.org/App_Themes/toyassociation_resp/downloads/resources/toy-association-toy-inventor-and-designer-guide.pdf (accessed 21.10.2023).Google Scholar
Thibault, M. (2015, December 18). Toward a semiotic analysis of toys. Proceedings of the World Conference of the IASS/AIS. New Semiotics. Between Tradition and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.24308/iass-2014-107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trawick-Smith, J., Wolff, J., Koschel, M., & Vallarelli, J. (2014). Effects of Toys on the Play Quality of Preschool Children: Influence of Gender, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(4), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-014-0644-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access