No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
INTEGRATED DESIGN METHODOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR A SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH-BASED DESIGN PROCESS FOR STIMULI-RESPONSIVE PRODUCTS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Complex global problems, such as sustainable crop production, where conventional products do not fully solve the problem due to their low efficacy and negative environmental impact, require rationally designed products. Generally, these products are based on efficient technologies and stimuli-responsive and high-performance materials. Considering the product design approach with a science-based approach such as drug development through QbD. We propose to merge the most relevant elements of these approaches in an integrated design methodology. Regarding the conceptual analysis, we propose two phases: initially, an early phase with conceptual solutions, followed by an advanced phase based on QbD elements to define the research hypothesis. Hence, optimal product conditions defined in the design space must comply with the required performance of the stimuli-responsive product. So, with this proposed integration we pretend to potentialize and strengthen the established tools for product design, achieving an advanced and robust design methodology.
Keywords
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Anderl, R., Picard, A. and Albrecht, K. (2013) “Smart Engineering for Smart Products,” pp. 1–10. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30817-8_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askeland, D. R. and Wright, W. J. (2018) Essentials of materials science and engineering. Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
van Boeijen, A. et al. (2013) “Delft design guide: Design methods,” Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering.Google Scholar
Borges, F. M. and Rodrigues, C. L. P. (2010) “Improvements in the product development method proposed by Pahl and Beitz,” Gestão & Produção, 17, pp. 271–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Y. et al. (2014) “Dual drug release from core–shell nanoparticles with distinct release profiles,” Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 103(10), pp. 3205–3216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cross, N. (2021) Engineering design methods: strategies for product design. 5th ed. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
Cross, N., Naughton, J. and Walker, D. (1981) “Design method and scientific method,” Design studies, 2(4), pp. 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eghbal, N. and Choudhary, R. (2018) “Complex coacervation: Encapsulation and controlled release of active agents in food systems,” LWT - Food Science and Technology. Academic Press, pp. 254–264. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.036.Google Scholar
Agency, European Medicines (2014) ICH Q8 (R2) Pharmaceutical development. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/ich-q8-r2-pharmaceutical-development (Accessed: January 29, 2022).Google Scholar
FAO, F. and A. O. of the U. N.- (2019) “World Fertilizer Trends and Outlook to 2022.” Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
FDA Services U.S. Department of Health and Human (2009) “Guidance for Industry Q8(R2) Pharmaceutical Development.” Available at: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm (Accessed: November 30, 2022).Google Scholar
Fukuda, I. M. et al. (2018) “Design of Experiments (DoE) applied to Pharmaceutical and Analytical Quality by Design (QbD),” Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 54(Special Issue). https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2175-97902018000001006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, N. K. et al. (2017) “Quality by Design (QbD)-enabled development of aceclofenac loaded-nano structured lipid carriers (NLCs): An improved dermatokinetic profile for inflammatory disorder(s),” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 517(1–2), pp. 413–431. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2016.12.010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, J. et al. (2014) “Implementation of QbD for the development of a vaccine candidate,” Vaccine, 32(24), pp. 2927–2930. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.VACCINE.2014.02.028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrencia, D. et al. (2021) “Controlled Release Fertilizers: A Review on Coating Materials and Mechanism of Release,” Plants 2021, Vol. 10, Page 238, 10(2), p. 238. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/PLANTS10020238.Google ScholarPubMed
Li, J., Qiao, Y. and Wu, Z. (2017) “Nanosystem trends in drug delivery using quality-by-design concept,” Journal of Controlled Release, 256, pp. 9–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.JCONREL.2017.04.019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liliana, L. (2016) “A new model of Ishikawa diagram for quality assessment,” in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, p. 12099.Google Scholar
López-Valdez, F. and Fernández-Luqueño, F. (2014) Fertilizers: Components, uses in agriculture and environmental impacts, Fertilizers: Components, Uses in Agriculture and Environmental Impacts.Google Scholar
Pallagi, E. et al. (2015) “Adaptation of the quality by design concept in early pharmaceutical development of an intranasal nanosized formulation,” International journal of pharmaceutics, 491(1–2), pp. 384–392. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2015.06.018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pessôa, Pereira, V, M.. and Jauregui Becker, J. M. (2020) “Smart design engineering: a literature review of the impact of the 4th industrial revolution on product design and development,” Research in Engineering Design, 31, pp. 175–195. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00330-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qutb, A. (2020) Smart Product Design Methodology. University of Windsor. Available at: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/8390 (Accessed: April 26, 2022).Google Scholar
Rathod, V. R., Shah, D. A. and Dave, R. H. (2020) “Systematic implementation of quality-by-design (QbD) to develop NSAID-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for ocular application: preformulation screening studies and statistical hybrid-design for optimization of variables,” https://doi.org/10.1080/03639045.2020.1724135, 46(3), pp. 443–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathore, A. S. and Kapoor, G. (2016) “Implementation of Quality by Design for processing of food products and biotherapeutics,” Food and Bioproducts Processing, 99, pp. 231–243. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.FBP.2016.05.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roozenburg, N. and Eekels, J. (1995) “The basic design cycle,” Product design: fundamentals and methods, pp. 84–93.Google Scholar
Sahay, R., Thavasi, V. and Ramakrishna, S. (2011) “Design modifications in electrospinning setup for advanced applications,” Journal of Nanomaterials, 2011, p. 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikder, A. et al. (2021) “Recent Trends in Advanced Polymer Materials in Agriculture Related Applications,” ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 3(3), pp. 1203–1217. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ACSAPM.0C00982/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AP0C00982_0007.JPEG.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, Q. et al. (2019) “Data reconciliation in the Quality-by-Design (QbD) implementation of pharmaceutical continuous tablet manufacturing,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 563, pp. 259–272. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2019.04.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D. and Yang, M. C. (2019) “Product Development Economics,” Product Design and Development, pp. 373–400.Google Scholar
Vega-Vásquez, P., Mosier, N. S. and Irudayaraj, J. (2020) “Nanoscale Drug Delivery Systems: From Medicine to Agriculture,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, M. P. and Hari, A. (2015) “Extension of the Pahl & Beitz systematic method for conceptual design of a new product,” in Procedia CIRP. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.03.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X., Khan, M. A. and Burgess, D. J. (2011) “A quality by design (QbD) case study on liposomes containing hydrophilic API: I. Formulation, processing design and risk assessment,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 419(1–2), pp. 52–59. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2011.07.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, X., Khan, M. A. and Burgess, D. J. (2012) “A quality by design (QbD) case study on liposomes containing hydrophilic API: II. Screening of critical variables, and establishment of design space at laboratory scale,” International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 423(2), pp. 543–553. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2011.11.036.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, L. X. (2008) “Pharmaceutical quality by design: Product and process development, understanding, and control,” Pharmaceutical Research, 25(4), pp. 781–791. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/S11095-007-9511-1/TABLES/2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, L. and Mao, S. (2017) “Application of quality by design in the current drug development,” Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 12(1), pp. 1–8. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.AJPS.2016.07.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
You have
Access
Open access