Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T22:10:54.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

HYBRID EDUCATION CONTENT AND PLATFORM FOR BACHELOR CURRICULUM IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2023

Benoit Eynard*
Affiliation:
Université de Technologie de Compiègne;
Pascale Bachmann
Affiliation:
Université de Technologie de Compiègne;
Sébastien Le-Loch
Affiliation:
Université de Nantes;
Damien Picard
Affiliation:
Université de Nantes;
Jean-Dominique Guérin
Affiliation:
Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France;
Matthieu Bricogne
Affiliation:
Université de Technologie de Compiègne;
Tatiana Reyes
Affiliation:
Université de Technologie de Troyes
*
Eynard, Benoit, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France, benoit.eynard@utc.fr

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During coronavirus time, academic organisations and education institutions have been faced to amazing and radical changes from one day to the other of their teaching contexts, practices, materials and standards and so on. Due to pandemic, in many countries professors, teachers, educators have been obliged to switch on remote education and teaching models with numerous virtual and digital solutions that at the beginning were more or less efficient and professional based. The paper will present a experiment feedback for large hybridation of technology and engineering curriculum for bachelor degree in French higher education system. The educational content and platform has been developed by the consortium of 14 different universities and higher education institutions. In the global topics covered by the project, a specific focus will be given in the paper on subject dealing with engineering design, systems engineering and sustainanibility.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Anushalalitha, T. (2023), “Precovid, Covid and Post Covid Classes and Online Engineering”, Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, Vol. 524, pp. 533546. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17091-1_53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fielding, E., McCardle, J., Eynard, B., Fraser, A. and Hartman, N. (2014), “PLM in design and engineering education: International perspectives”, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 22, No 2, pp. 123134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063293X13520316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazee, R.V. (2003), “Using Relevance To Facilitate Online Participation in a Hybrid Course”, Educause Quarterly, Vol. 26, No 4, pp. 6771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0060-3Google Scholar
Gopal, R., Singh, V. and Aggarwal, A. (2021), “Impact of online classes on the satisfaction and performance of students during the pandemic period of COVID 19”, Education and Information Technologies, Vol. 26, No 6, pp. 69236947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10523-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, C.R. (2013), “Emerging practice and research in blended learning”. In Moore, M.G. (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
Hall-Rivera, J. (2017), “The blended learning environment: a viable alternative for special needs students”, Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol. 5, No 2. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i2.2125Google Scholar
Halverson, L.R., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J., Drysdale, J.S. and Henrie, C.R. (2014), “A thematic analysis of the most cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research”, Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 20, pp. 2034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helms, S.A. (2014), “Blended/hybrid courses a review of the literature and recommendations for instructional designers and educators”, Interactive Learning Environments, Vol. 22, No 6, pp. 804810. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozma, R. (1994), “Will media influence learning? Reframing the debate”, Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 42, No 2, pp. 719. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linder, K.E. (2017), “Fundamentals of Hybrid Teaching and Learning”, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No 149. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormack, C.M. and Caldwell, B. (2022), “Learner-Centered Design of Online Courses: A Transdisciplinary Systems Engineering Case Design”, Transdisciplinary Engineering, July 5-8, 2022, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
McCray, G.E. (2000), “The hybrid course: Merging on-line instruction and the traditional classroom”, Information Technology and Management, Vol. 1, No 4, pp. 307327. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019189412115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirriahi, N., Alonzo, D. and Fox, B. (2015), “A blended learning framework for curriculum design and professional development”, Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 23. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v23.28451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osguthorpe, R.T. and Graham, C.R. (2003), “Blended learning environments: definitions and directions”, Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol. 4, No 3, pp. 227448.Google Scholar
Pei, E., Ressin, M., Campbell, R.I., Eynard, B., and Xiao, J. (2019), “Investigating the impact of additive manufacturing data exchange standards for re-distributed manufacturing”, Progress in Additive Manufacturing, Vol. 4, No 3, pp. 331344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-019-00085-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perpignan, C., Robin, V., Baouch, Y. and Eynard, B. (2020), “Identification of contribution and lacks of the ecodesign education to the achievement of sustainability issues by analyzing the French education system”, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 4, No 3, pp. 331344. Vol. 34, No 1, pp. 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060419000465Google Scholar
Rassudov, L. and Korunets, A. (2020), “COVID-19 Pandemic Challenges for Engineering Education”, 11th International Conference on Electrical Power Drive Systems, ICEPDS 2020, Saint Petersburg, Russia, October 4-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, C., Qin, X., Eynard, B., Li, J., Bai, J., Zhang, Y. and Gomes, S. (2019), “Interface model-based configuration design of mechatronic systems for industrial manufacturing applications”, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 59, pp. 373384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2019.05.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zitter, I. and Hoeve, A. (2012), Hybrid Learning Environments: Merging Learning and Work Processes to Facilitate Knowledge Integration and Transitions, OECD Education Working Papers, 81.Google Scholar