No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
EFFECT OF INTERMEDIARY OBJECT USE DURING COLLABORATIVE DESIGN ACTIVITIES OF IMMERSIVE APPLICATIONS: FOCUS ON PROFESSIONAL TRAINING APPLICATION
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Industry 4.0 introduces innovative ways of professional training thanks to new technologies such as Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality. Despite improvements, there's still a lack of a good user experience and connection between user needs and these applications. To tackle this problem, designers of such applications must work in a collaborative way integrating final users. It's specifically true during design phases such as scenario creation. But the co-creation of scenario is a difficult task for designers and final users who don't have enough expertise with IT. A solution seems to stand in intermediary objects (IOs) which are well known for their characteristics of mediation, transformation, and representation. We have studied the use of different IOs during a project consisting in designing an immersive professional training application for risk hunting for Stäubli company. We used an IO1 made of an excel sheet and an IO2 made of 360 views of the workshop. Two ideation sessions with two groups of designers were conducted to propose a scenario consisting of several risks to spot in the future application. Results show that the scenario was improved using the IO2, and final users and designers were more collaborative.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Abed, H., Pernelle, P., Carron, T. and Amar, C.B. (2016), “Scenario Modeling for Serious Games: An Approach for Industry Sector”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akçayır, M. and Akçayır, G. (2017), “Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature”, Educational Research Review, Vol. 20, pp. 1–11, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alben, L. (1996), “Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design”, Interactions, Vol. 3 No. 3, pp. 11–15, https://dx.doi.org/10.1145/235008.235010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnaldi, B., Guitton, P., Moreau, G. and Fuchs, P. (2018), Réalité virtuelle et réalité augmentée: mythes et réalités.Google Scholar
Bisson, I., Mahdjoub, M., Zare, M., Bluntzer, J.-B., Sagot, J.-C., Goutaudier, F. and Ravier, F. (2022), “Proposal of a Conceptual Framework for Collaborative Design of Immersive Professional Training: Application to the Textile Industry”, Proceedings of the Design Society, Vol. 2, pp. 111–120, https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/pds.2022.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccara, V. (2018), “Training design oriented by works analysis”, Beyond Safety Training, Springer, Cham, pp. 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boccara, V. and Delgoulet, C. (2015), “L'analyse des travails pour la conception en formation: Contribution de l'ergonomie à l'orientation de la conception amont d'un environnement virtuel pour la formation”, Activites, Vol. 12 No. 2, https://dx.doi.org/10.4000/activites.1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boujut, J.-F. (2003), “User-defined annotations: artefacts for co-ordination and shared understanding in design teams”, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 409–419, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544820310001606885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boujut, J.-F. and Blanco, E. (2003), “Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, O. (2011), “Participatory ergonomics in design processes: The role of boundary objects”, Applied Ergonomics, p. 9.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, J.-M. (2003), “Réalité virtuelle et ergonomie : quelques apports réciproques”, Le travail humain, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlier, B., Daele, A. and Deschryver, N. (2002), “Vers une approche intégrée des technologies de l'information et de la communication dans les pratiques d'enseignement”, Revue Des Sciences de l’éducation, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 345–365, https://dx.doi.org/10.7202/007358ar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgoulet, C., Boccara, V., Carpentier, K. and Lourdeaux, D. (2015), “How designing a virtual environment for professional training from an activity framework?”, Proceedings 19th Triennial Congress of TheInternational Ergonomics Association, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Jeantet, A. (1998), “Les objets intermédiaires dans la conception. Éléments pour une sociologie des processus de conception”, Sociologie du travail, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 291–316, https://dx.doi.org/10.3406/sotra.1998.1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeantet, A., Tiger, H., Vinck, D. and Tichkiewitch, S. (1996), “La coordination par les objets dans les équipes intégrées de conception de produit”, Terssac, G., Friedberg, E. (éds), Coopération et conception. Toulouse : Éd. Octares, pp. 87–100.Google Scholar
Khatib, A.A. (2015), “The impact of immersive Virtual Reality On collaboration in Design Meetings: A comparative Study”, 45th International Conference on Computers & Industrial Engineering, presented at the CIE45, Metz (54), France.Google Scholar
Kobenan, K.J.-M. (2016), Contribution à l’évaluation de la qualité de la collaboration en conception de produits., phdthesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, 9 December.Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, E., Dominjon, L., Perret, D., Erhel, S., Jamet, É., Michinov, N., Andriot, C., et al. (2013), “La démarche de Conception Centrée-Utilisateur en Réalité Virtuelle : l'exemple du projet VirtualiTeach”.Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, E., Jamet, E., Ragot, M., Erhel, S. and Michinov, N. (2015), “Comment concevoir une plate-forme ergonomique de réalité virtuelle pour l'apprentissage de concepts scientifiques ?”, p. 7.Google Scholar
Loup-Escande, E., Jamet, É., Ragot, M., Erhel, S., Michinov, N., Peltier, C. and Lopez, T. (2015), “Concevoir des environnements virtuels éducatifs avec les utilisateurs finaux : Exemple du projet VirtualiTeach”, Terminal, No. 117, https://dx.doi.org/10.4000/terminal.1093.Google Scholar
Lourdeaux, D., Fuchs, P., Burkhardt, J.-M. and Bernard, F. (2002), “Relevance of an intelligent tutorial agent for virtual reality training systems”, International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning, Vol. 12 No. 1/2/3/4, p. 214, https://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2002.000430.Google Scholar
Marfisi-Schottman, I., Sghaier, A., George, S., Tarpin-Bernard, F. and Prévôt, P. (2009), “Towards Industrialized Conception and Production of Serious Games”.Google Scholar
Oubahssi, L., Mahdi, O., Piau-Toffolon, C., Iksal, S. and Messiaen, A. (2018), “A process of design and production of Virtual Reality Learning Environments”.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogalski, Samurçay and. (1998), “Exploitation didactique des situations de simulation”, Le Travail Humain, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 333–359.Google Scholar
Vinck, D. (1992), Du laboratoire aux réseaux: le travail scientifique en mutation, Office des publ. officielles des Communautés Européennes, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Vinck, D. and Jeantet, A. (1995), “Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design : a conceptual approach”, in MACLEAN (Donald), SAVIOTTI (Paolo), and VINCK (Dominique) (Eds.), Designs, Networks and Strategies, Directorate General Science, R&D, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
Vinck, D., Jeantet, A. and Laureillard, P. (1996), “Objects and Other Intermediaries in the Sociotechnical Process of Product Design : an exploratory approach”, in PERRIN (Jacques), V. (Dominique) (Ed.), The Role of Design in the Shaping of Technology, Directorate General Science, R&D., pp. 297–320.Google Scholar
Vinck, D. and Laureillard, P. (1996), “Coordination par les objets dans les processus de conception”.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access