Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T06:45:25.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DESIGNING A SHAPED SEAT-PAN CUSHION TO IMPROVE POSTURAL (DIS)COMFORT REDUCING PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION AND INCREASING CONTACT AREA AT THE INTERFACE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 July 2021

Iolanda Fiorillo*
Affiliation:
University of Salerno
Yu Song
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Peter Vink
Affiliation:
Delft University of Technology
Alessandro Naddeo
Affiliation:
University of Salerno
*
Fiorillo, Iolanda, University of Salerno, Industrial Engineering, Italy, ifiorillo@unisa.it

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Remaining seated for extended periods increases the risk health issues and discomfort perception. Consequently, the seat-pan design is crucial and could be mainly influenced by two factors: pressure distribution and seat contour. For seat pan discomfort, the lower average pressure is accompanied by less discomfort. Moreover, a seat contour with a large contact area is correlated with more comfort. Thus, a shaped cushion had been accurately designed (Virtual Prototype) and realized (Physical Prototype) aiming to translate the pressure distribution due to interaction between seat and buttock in a geometric shape, suitable for the international population (including P5 females and P95 males). With this shape, the pressure should be more uniform and lower, the contact area at interface bigger, and the perceived comfort higher. Both Virtual and Physical Prototype design had been described in this paper through a repeatable and straightforward approach. Also, experiments had been performed to validate the hypothesis through a comparison with a standard flat cushion. Results showed the goal of the design had been reached: the shaped cushion scored less pressure distribution and higher contact area than the flat cushion.

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

A consensus document. (2010), “International review. Pressure ulcer prevention: pressure, shear, friction and microclimate in context.”, Wounds International.Google Scholar
Anderl, R., Mecke, K. and Klug, L. (2007), “Advanced Prototyping With Parametric Prototypes”, pp. 503510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cascioli, V., Liu, Z., Heusch, A. and McCarthy, P. (2016), “A methodology using in-chair movements as an objective measure of discomfort for the purpose of statistically distinguishing between similar seat surfaces”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 54, pp. 100109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Falou, El, Duchêne, W., Grabisch, J., Hewson, M., Langeron, D., and Lino, Y., F. (2003), “Evaluation of driver discomfort during long-duration car driving”, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 249255.Google Scholar
Fang, F., Shen, L., Chen, Y. and Yuding, Z. (2016), “A Method for Measuring the Weight of Body Segment Based on Human Model and Body Pressure Distribution”, Vol. 485, pp. 735741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. and Lang, A.-G. (2009), “Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses”, Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 11491160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G. and Buchner, A. (2007), “G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences”, Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 175191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, R.A. (1992), “Statistical Methods for Research Workers”, in Kotz, S. and Johnson, N.L. (Eds.), Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution, Springer New York, New York, NY, pp. 6670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, M., Zenk, R., Durt, A. and Vink, P. (2008), “The Influence of a Massage Car Seat on Comfort Experience and EMG”, available at:https://doi.org/10.4271/2008-01-0889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, I., Gao, Z. and Campbell, R.I. (2004), “A comparative study of virtual prototyping and physical prototyping”, IJMTM, Vol. 6, pp. 503522.Google Scholar
Groenesteijn, L., Hiemstra-van Mastrigt, S., Gallais, C., Blok, M., Kuijt-Evers, L. and Vink, P. (2014), “Activities, postures and comfort perception of train passengers as input for train seat design”, Ergonomics, Vol. 57, pp. 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartung, J., Mergl, C. and Bubb, H. (2004), “Reliability of Pressure Measurement on Car Seats”, SAE Technical Papers, Vol. 113, available at:https://doi.org/10.4271/2004-01-2167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helander, M. and Zhang, L. (1997), “Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting”, Ergonomics, Vol. 40, pp. 895915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mastrigt, Hiemstra-van, Groenesteijn, S., Vink, L., and Kuijt-Evers, P., L. (2016), “Predicting passenger seat comfort and discomfort on the basis of human, context and seat characteristics: a literature review”, Ergonomics, Vol. 60, pp. 144.Google Scholar
Mastrigt, Hiemstra-van, Meyenborg, S., and Hoogenhout, I., M. (2016), “The influence of activities and duration on comfort and discomfort development in time of aircraft passengers”, Work, Vol. 54, pp. 17.Google Scholar
Kamp, I. (2012), “The influence of car-seat design on its character experience”, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 329335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolich, M. and Taboun, S.M. (2004), “Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort”, Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 47 No. 8, pp. 841863.Google ScholarPubMed
Krouskop, T.A., Noble, P.C., Garber, S.L. and Spencer, W.A. (1983), “The effectiveness of preventive management in reducing the occurrence of pressure sores.”, Journal of Rehabilitation R&D, United States, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 7483.Google Scholar
Kyung, G. and Nussbaum, M. (2008), “Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (Part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 38, pp. 526538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, B. (2011), Design School Integration Of Physical And Virtual Prototyping, Loughborough University.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Yu, S. and Chu, J. (2019), “The Passengers’ Comfort Improvement by Sitting Activity and Posture Analysis in Civil Aircraft Cabin”, edited by Renno, F. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, Vol. 2019, p. 3278215.Google Scholar
De Looze, M.P., Kuijt-Evers, L.F.M. and Van Dieen, J. (2003), “Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures”, Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis, Vol. 46 No. 10, pp. 985997.Google Scholar
Mansfield, N., Sammonds, G. and Nguyen, L. (2015), “Driver discomfort in vehicle seats – Effect of changing road conditions and seat foam composition”, Applied Ergonomics, Elsevier, Vol. 50, pp. 153159.Google Scholar
McManus, A.M., Ainslie, P.N., Green, D.J., Simair, R.G., Smith, K. and Lewis, N. (2015), “Impact of prolonged sitting on vascular function in young girls”, Experimental Physiology, Vol. 100 No. 11, pp. 13791387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Molenbroek, J.F.M., Albin, T.J. and Vink, P. (2017), “Thirty years of anthropometric changes relevant to the width and depth of transportation seating spaces, present and future”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 65, pp. 130138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naddeo, A., Di Brigida, L., Fontana, C., Montese, J., Quartuccia, M., Nasti, M., Pisani, M.M., et al. (2019), “A body-shaped lumbar-sacral support for improving car-seat comfort”, Work.Google Scholar
Naddeo, A., Califano, R. and Vink, P. (2018), “The effect of posture, pressure and load distribution on (dis)comfort perceived by students seated on school chairs”, International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-018-0479-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naddeo, A., Cappetti, N., Califano, R. and Vallone, M. (2015), “The Role of Expectation in Comfort Perception: The Mattresses’ Evaluation Experience”, Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naddeo, A. and Memoli, S. (2009), Postural Comfort inside a Car: Development of an Innovative Model to Evaluate the Discomfort Level, SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars -Mechanical Systems, Vol. 2.Google Scholar
Schubert, V., Perbeck, L. and Schubert, P.-Å. (1994), “Skin microcirculatory and thermal changes in elderly subjects with early stage of pressure sores”, Clinical Physiology, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smulders, M., Berghman, K., Koenraads, M., Kane, J.A., Krishna, K., Carter, T. and Schultheis, U. (2016), “Comfort and pressure distribution in a human contour shaped aircraft seat (developed with 3D scans of the human body)”, Work, Vol. 54, pp. 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, M. and Bartley, C. (2017), “Understanding the association between pressure ulcers and sitting in adults what does it mean for me and my carers? Seating guidelines for people, carers and health & social care professionals”, Journal of Tissue Viability, Vol. 27, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2017.09.004.Google ScholarPubMed
Susanne, M., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A. and Faul, F. (2007), “A short tutorial of GPower”, Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, Vol. 3, available at:https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thosar, S., Bielko, S., Mather, K., Johnston, J. and Wallace, J. (2014), “Effect of Prolonged Sitting and Breaks in Sitting Time on Endothelial Function”, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 47, available at:https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vink, P. (2016), Vehicle Seat Comfort and Design, 1st ed.Google Scholar
Vink, P. and Lips, D. (2017), “Sensitivity of the human back and buttocks: The missing link in comfort seat design”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 58, pp. 287292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, X., Savonnet, L., Beurier, G. and Obadia, J. (2020), “An Experimental Investigation of Preferred Seat Pressure Distribution”, pp. 330335.Google Scholar
Zemp, R., Taylor, W. and Lorenzetti, S. (2015), “Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 48, available at:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zemp, R., Taylor, W.R. and Lorenzetti, S. (2016), “Seat pan and backrest pressure distribution while sitting in office chairs.”, Applied Ergonomics, England, Vol. 53 Pt A, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Zenk, R., Franz, M., Bubb, H. and Vink, P. (2012), “Technical note: Spine loading in automotive seating”, Applied Ergonomics, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 290295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zenk, R., Mergl, C., Hartung, J., Sabbah, O. and Bubb, H. (2006), “Objectifying the Comfort of Car Seats”, SAE 2006 World Congress & Exhibition, SAE International, available at:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Helander, M.G. and Drury, C.G. (1996), “Identifying Factors of Comfort and Discomfort in Sitting”, Human Factors, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 377389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar