No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
CHALLENGES OF PRODUCT MODULARIZATION METHODS IN SMES: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A MANUFACTURER OF RIGID INFLATABLE BOATS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Nowadays, Western rigid inflatable boat (RIB) manufacturers are facing increased competition from Asian and Middle East producers and the need to push the modularization of their product architecture. Many modularization techniques have been developed to support this effort, being the Modular Function Deployment a well-established multi-stage modularization technique with applications in several industries. Despite the reported literature, the challenges and learnings from the application of modularization techniques have focused on large organizations and complex product systems. In this paper, a case study is presented with the objective of analysing the MFD process implementation in the context of an SME manufacturer of RIB. A learning framework focused on the project and process perspectives is used to facilitate the systematic extraction of lessons from the experience of the MFD implementation. This paper contributes to the modularization techniques literature by observing a modularization method as a learning process and makes it evident the call for more investigation on the implementation process of modularization methods.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Borjesson, F. (2010), “A Systematic Qualitative Comparison of Five Approaches to Modularity”, International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia, pp. 147–156.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, K.A., Robinson, M., Scazzuso, F., Gallagher, S.M. and Browning, T. (2012), “Incorporating Modularity into Ship System Designs for Increased Adaptability”, Proceedings of the Maritime Systems and Technologies (MAST) Conference, Malmö, Sweden.Google Scholar
Daidola, J.C. (2021), “Modularity: Facilitator for commercial shipyards in naval shipbuilding”, Journal of Ship Production and Design, Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 97–108, https://dx.doi.org/10.5957/JSPD.11190059.Google Scholar
Erixon, G. (1998), Modular Function Deployment, Institutionen för produktionssystem, PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Jeong, B., Wang, H., Oguz, E. and Zhou, P. (2018), “An effective framework for life cycle and cost assessment for marine vessels aiming to select optimal propulsion systems”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Elsevier Ltd, Vol. 187, pp. 111–130, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.184.Google Scholar
Holtta, Katja and Salonen, Mikko. (2003), “Comparing three modularity methods”, ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Lee, D., Park, J., Pulshashi, I.R. and Bae, H. (2017), “Clustering and operation analysis for assembly blocks using process mining in shipbuilding industry”, Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, Vol. 159, Springer Verlag, pp. 67–80, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02922-1_5.Google Scholar
Lehtinen, J., Lehtonen, T., Juuti, T. and Riitahuhta, A. (2012), Factors Affecting to Exploitation of Modularity, NordDesign.Google Scholar
McClory, S., Read, M. and Labib, A. (2017), “Conceptualising the lessons-learned process in project management: Towards a triple-loop learning framework”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 1322–1335, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.05.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, A., Pons, D. and Neitzert, T. (2018), “Implementing lean—Outcomes from SME case studies”, Operations Research Perspectives, Vol. 5, pp. 94–104, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2018.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pero, M., Stößlein, M. and Cigolini, R. (2015), “Linking product modularity to supply chain integration in the construction and shipbuilding industries”, International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, Vol. 170, pp. 602–615, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piñeros Bello, L.A. and Segovia Forero, C.E. (2020), “Evolution and Present of Modularity in Warships”, Proceeding of the VI International Ship Design & Naval Engineering Congress (CIDIN) and XXVI Pan-American Congress of Naval Engineering, Maritime Transportation and Port Engineering (COPINAVAL), Springer International Publishing, pp. 201–210, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35963-8_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirrung, C. (2004), “Comparison of Different Modularisation Methods and their best application”, Proceedings from the 2nd Seminar on Development of Modular Products, pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
Ramsay, S. (2012), “A Case for a New Warship-Building Strategy”, Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, Informa UK Limited, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 150–156, https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2012.690566.Google Scholar
Reich, Y. and Subrahmanian, E. (2022a), “Documenting design research by structured multilevel analysis: supporting the diversity of the design research community of practice”, Design Science, Cambridge University Press, Vol. 8, p. e3, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, Y. and Subrahmanian, E. (2022b), “The PSI Framework and Theory of Design”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 1037–1049, https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2973238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009), Research Methods for Business Students, Harlow, Financial Times Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Schlierer, H.-J., Werner, A., Signori, S., Garriga, E., von Weltzien Hoivik, H., van Rossem, A. and Fassin, Y. (2012), “How Do European SME Owner–Managers Make Sense of ‘Stakeholder Management’?: Insights from a Cross-National Study”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 109 No. 1, pp. 39–51, https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1378-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.S., Robb, M.D., Duffy, A.H.B., Thomson, A. and Nisbet, C. (2001), “An Experience of Modularity Through Design”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design.Google Scholar
Sonego, M., Echeveste, M., Fogliatto, F.S., Tonetto, L.M. and Caten, C.S. t. (2016), “Modular Function Deployment Adapted”, DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, pp. 1407–1416.Google Scholar
Suh, C.J. and Lee, I.T. (2018), “An empirical study on the manufacturing firm's strategic choice for sustainability in SMEs”, Sustainability (Switzerland), MDPI, Vol. 10 No. 2, https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10020572.Google Scholar
Tee, R., Davies, A. and Whyte, J. (2019), “Modular designs and integrating practices: Managing collaboration through coordination and cooperation”, Research Policy, Elsevier B.V., Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 51–61, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A., Runcie, E. and Morris, L. (2009), “Embedding innovation: design thinking for small enterprises”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 30 No. 2/3, pp. 78–84, https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02756660910942490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, X.T., Stewart, B., Wang, W., Tramsheck, R., Liggat, J., Duffy, A.H.B. and Whitfield, I. (2007), “Developing and Applying an Integrated Modular Design Methodology within a SME”, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’07.Google Scholar
You have
Access
Open access