Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:18:59.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges and Opportunities in Remote Prototyping: A Case-Study during COVID-19

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 May 2022

N. M. Martins Pacheco ,
A. Vazhapilli Sureshbabu ,
E. Dieckmann ,
M. Apud Bell ,
S. Green ,
P. Childs  and
M. Zimmermann
N. M. Martins Pacheco*
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
A. Vazhapilli Sureshbabu
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
E. Dieckmann
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, United Kingdom
M. Apud Bell
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, United Kingdom
S. Green
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, United Kingdom
P. Childs
Affiliation:
Imperial College London, United Kingdom
M. Zimmermann
Affiliation:
Technical University of Munich, Germany
*
martins.pacheco@tum.de

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Collaboration is common practice within design disciplines and beyond. Brainstorming, discussions, and prototyping tend to occur within the same physical space. The reduction of human interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic disrupted these practices. In this paper, we focus on the possibilities and challenges of remote prototyping of four student teams by combining a double diamond approach with tools to overcome remote work challenges. The results were analyzed to understand crucial tools, advantages, and obstacles. The key challenges and opportunities were then identified and examined.

Keywords

collaborative designprototypingdesign toolssupportive technologies
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society , Volume 2: DESIGN2022 , May 2022 , pp. 231 - 240
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2022.

References

Ball, J. (2019). The double diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process. The Design Council UK https://www.designcouncil.org. Uk/News-Opinion/Double-Diamond-Universally-Accepted-Depiction-Design-Process.Google Scholar
Maher, M. lou, Bilda, Z., & Gül, L. F. (2006). Impact of Collaborative Virtual Environments on Design Behaviour. In Design Computing and Cognition ’06. Springer Netherlands. 10.1007/978-1-4020-5131-9_16Google Scholar
Pacheco, Martins, Behrenbeck, N. M., Tariq, J., Vazhapilli Sureshbabu, B., & Zimmermann, A., M. (2020). A Role-based Prototyping Approach for Human-Centred Design in Fuzzy Front-End Scenarios. Balancing Innovation and Operation. 10.35199/NORDDESIGN2020.7Google Scholar
Nee, A. Y. C., Ong, S. K., Chryssolouris, G., & Mourtzis, D. (2012). Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 61(2). 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.010Google Scholar
Silva, P. C. L., Batista, P. V. C., Lima, H. S., Alves, M. A., Guimarães, F. G., & Silva, R. C. P. (2020). COVID-ABS: An agent-based model of COVID-19 epidemic to simulate health and economic effects of social distancing interventions. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 139. 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tschimmel, K. (2012). Design Thinking as an effective Toolkit for Innovation. ISPIM Conference Proceedings, 1.Google Scholar
Tucker, T., Dancholvichit, N., & Liebenberg, L. (2021). Collaborative Learning in an Online-only Design for Manufacturability Course. 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings. 10.18260/1-2--36808Google Scholar
van Nifterik, W., Visser, F. S., & van Erp, J. (2021). Remote contextmapping and prototyping during lockdown, a study case. Interaction Design and Architecture (s), 50, 7–26.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. S. (2010, January 1). Physical Models in Idea Generation: Hindrance or Help? Volume 5: 22nd International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; Special Conference on Mechanical Vibration and Noise. 10.1115/DETC2010-28327Google Scholar
Ye, X., Frens, J., & Hu, J. (2021). Adjusting to a Distributed Collaborative Design Process During the COVID-19 Pandemic. IEEE Pervasive Computing. 10.1109/MPRV.2021.3111448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zorriassatine, F., Wykes, C., Parkin, R. M., & Gindy, N. N. Z. (2003). A survey of virtual prototyping techniques for mechanical product development. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217, 513–530.Google Scholar