No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
ASSESSING EYE GAZE PATTERNS BETWEEN INTERMEDIATE AND ADVANCED DESIGN SKETCHERS
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 June 2023
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
One difficulty with sketching pedagogy is the tendency to assess growth according to outcomes, as opposed to processes. We assessed eye gaze patterns between advanced and intermediate design sketchers and anticipated correlations between eye-gaze practices and sketching proficiency. Participants sketched two different objects using analogue materials, a potted plant from memory, and a MacBook from observation.
The study utilised Tobii 3 adjustable eye-tracking glasses and Tobii Pro data processing software. Twenty-five design sketching students and six design sketching instructors participated in the study.
Metrics measured include the quantity of reference line gazes, eye movement during line creation (targeting vs tracking), eye fixation duration, work checks per minute and subject gazes per minute.
The results show a difference in gaze patterns between intermediate and advanced sketchers, both in terms of practice and consistency. Eye-tracking sketching behaviours has revealed a new understanding of how teaching gaze habits could lead to improved methods of design sketching instruction.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.- Copyright
- The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
References
Arnheim, R. (1993), “Sketching and the Psychology of Design”, Design Issues, Vol. 9 No. 2, p.15. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergstrom, J.R. and Schall, A.J. (2014), Eye tracking in user experience design, Elsevier/ Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Bermingham, A. (2000), Learning to draw : studies in the cultural history of a polite and useful art, Published For The Paul Mellon Centre For Studies In British Art By Yale University Press, New Haven, Ct., USA.Google Scholar
Christie, J., Reichertz, M., Maycock, B. and Klein, R.M. (2020), “To erase or not to erase, that is not the question: Drawing from observation in an analogue or digital environment”, Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00023_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gero, J.S., Wong, P. and Yu, R. (2023), “Reading architectural elements and spaces: An eye-tracking exploration”, Journal of Architectural and Planning Research. https://sites.google.com/view/johngero/publications/publicationsGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, G. (1991), “The dialectics of sketching”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, C.C., Causer, J., Miall, R.C., Grey, M.J., Humphreys, G. and Williams, A.M. (2015), “Identifying the causal mechanisms of the quiet eye”, European Journal of Sport Science, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp.74–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2015.1075595CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houzangbe, S., Masson, D., Fleury, S., Gómez Jáuregui, D.A., Legardeur, J., Richir, S. and Couture, N. (2022), “Is virtual reality the solution? A comparison between 3D and 2D creative sketching tools in the early design process”, Frontiers in Virtual Reality, Vol. 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.958223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C.I. and Mayer, R.E. (2012), “An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp.178–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026923Google ScholarPubMed
Kaul, P., Rajanna, V. and Hammond, T. (2016), “Exploring users’ perceived activities in a sketch-based intelligent tutoring system through eye movement data”, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception, pp. 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1145/2931002.2948727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maycock, B., Liu, G. and Klein, R. M. (2009), “Where to begin? Eye-movement when drawing”, Journal of Research Practice, Vol. 5 No. 2, Article M3. http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/179/177Google Scholar
Park, J.A. and Kim, Y.S. (2007), “Visual Reasoning and Design Processes”, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED'07), Cite des Sciences et de L'Industrie, Paris, France, August 28-31, The Design Society.Google Scholar
Park, J.A., and Kim, Y.S. (2009), “Visual Reasoning as a critical attribute in design creativity.” International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED'09), Palo Alto, CA, USA, August 24-27, The Design Society.Google Scholar
Rahimian, F.P. and Ibrahim, R. (2011), “Impacts of VR 3D sketching on novice designers’ spatial cognition in collaborative conceptual architectural design”, Design Studies, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 255–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovida, E. (2012), Machines and Signs, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
Türkmen, R., Pfeuffer, K., Barrera Machuca, M.D., Batmaz, A.U. and Gellersen, H. (2022), “Exploring Discrete Drawing Guides to Assist Users in Accurate Mid-air Sketching in VR”, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williford, B., Runyon, M. and Hammond, T. (2020), “Recognizing perspective accuracy”, Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. https://doi.org/10.1145/3377325.3377511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access
Open access