Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:30:37.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SUPPORTING ENGINEERING STUDENTS IN ANALYSING SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF A PRODUCT: LESSONS LEARNED

Part of: Design Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2020

P. Lagun Mesquita  and
M. Missimer
P. Lagun Mesquita
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
M. Missimer*
Affiliation:
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Sweden
*
*mis@bth.se

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Though many engineering schools are integrating sustainability in the curriculum, most are still struggling, especially with social sustainability. The aim with this study was to test a process created to help students work systematically with these issues. Results show that students in the study did indeed benefit from structured process support as their general knowledge level of social sustainability issues as well as their understanding of how to integrate them in a product assessment was very low. Reflections from teaching staff on how to further develop such a process are also shared.

Keywords

social responsibilitydesign educationdesign learninglife cycle assessment (LCA)process analysis
Type
Article
Information
Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference , Volume 1 , May 2020 , pp. 1755 - 1764
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

References

Barry, J. (2012), The Politics of Actually Existing Unsustainability: Human Flourishing in a Climate-Changed, Carbon-Constrained World, Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199695393.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoît, C. et al. (2010), “The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-009-0147-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blewitt, J. (2010), “Higher education for a sustainable world”, Education & Training, Vol. 52 No. 6/7, pp. 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400911011068432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, E.F. et al. (2011), “The CDIO syllabus v2. 0. An updated statement of goals for engineering education”, In: Proceedings of 7th international CDIO conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Dreyer, L., Hauschild, M. and Schierbeck, J. (2005), “A Framework for Social LifeCycle Impact Assessment”, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.08.223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edvardsson Björnberg, K., Skogh, I.-B. and Strömberg, E. (2015), “Integrating social sustainability in engineering education at the KTH Royal Institute of Technology”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 639–649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijshe-01-2014-0010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Zein, A. et al. (2008), “Sustainability and ethics as decision-making paradigms in engineering curricula”, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810856314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J.J. (2016), “Does engineering education need to engage more with the economic and social aspects of sustainability?”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 42 No. 6, pp. 916–926. http://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2016.1233167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forum for the Future (2000), The engineer of the 21st century inquiry – engineers for sustainability, Available at http://www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/uploadstore/Engineers_for_Sustainability.pdf, UK, London.Google Scholar
Jones, S.A. and Michelfelder, D.P. (2015), From Caring about Sustainability to Developing Care-ful Engineers, Engineering Faculty Publications and Presentations, Available at: http://pilotscholars.up.edu/egr_facpubs/37.Google Scholar
Lönngren, J. (2019), “Exploring the discursive construction of ethics in an introductory engineering course”, proceedings of the 8th research in engineering education symposium, rees 2019 - making connections, pp. 262.Google Scholar
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.-H. and Broman, G. (2017a), “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 1: exploring the social system”, Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 140, pp. 32–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.-H. and Broman, G. (2017b), “A strategic approach to social sustainability – Part 2: a principle-based definition”, Journal of Cleaner Production, No. 140, pp. 42–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SFS (1993), Högskoleförordningen (The Higher Education Ordinance), Available at: https://www.uhr.se/en/start/laws-and-regulations/Laws-and-regulations/The-Higher-Education-Ordinance/ (Accessed Nov 13th, 2019).Google Scholar
Steffen, W. et al. (2011), “The Anthropocene: From Global Change to Planetary Stewardship”, AMBIO, Vol. 40 No. 7, pp. 739–761. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0185-xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sustainable Development Solutions Network (2017), SDG Index and Dashboards Report 2017, Compact edition, Bertelsmann Stiftung & Pica Publishing.Google Scholar
UNESCO (2005), United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014), United Nations Educational, Cultural and Scientific Organisation, Paris.Google Scholar
WWF (2010), Living Planet Report. Biodiversity, biocapacity and development, Gland, World Wildlife Fund, Switzerland.Google Scholar