Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T20:41:12.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stoichiometry of in vitro fermentation of pure substrates with particular emphasis on methane production, using the cumulative gas production technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

Angela R. Moss  and
Karen C. O'Callaghan
Angela R. Moss
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation & Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Dairy Research Centre, Drayton Manor Drive, Alcester Road, Stratford-upon Avon, CV37 9RQ , UK
Karen C. O'Callaghan
Affiliation:
Feed Evaluation & Nutritional Sciences, ADAS Dairy Research Centre, Drayton Manor Drive, Alcester Road, Stratford-upon Avon, CV37 9RQ , UK
Get access

Extract

There is a need to be able to measure the methane producing potential of a range of feedstuffs under different rumen conditions in order to predict more accurately the amount of methane produced per animal. In vitro techniques using rumen fluid as an innoculum can be considered as models of in vivo rumen digestion and have been applied to estimate digestibility of feedstuffs. The in vitro gas production technique (Menke et. al., 1979) can be used successfully to estimate this but there has been limited attempts to use it to estimate the methane producing potential of feedstuffs. The objective was to assess the potential of the technique to do this.

Three pure substrates, glucose (G), pectin (P) and cellulose (C) (lg) were pre-wetted in 94ml of medium D (Theodorou et. al., 1994). inoculated with strained rumen fluid (from wether sheep. 10ml) and incubated without agitation for 72h at 39°C.

Type
Ruminant Nutrition and Metabolism In Vitro
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 1996 , March 1996 , pp. 24
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Demeyer, D. I. 1991. Quantitative aspects of microbial metabolism in the rumen and hindgut. In: Jouany, J. P. (Ed) Rumen Microbial Metabolism and Ruminant Digestion pp. 216–237.Google Scholar
France, J., Dhanoa, M. S., Theodorou, M. K., Lister, S. J., Davies, D. R. and Isac, D. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology 163:99–111.10.1006/jtbi.1993.1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, K. H., Raab, L., Salewski, A., Steingass, R, Fritz, D. and Schneider, W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolisable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agriculture and Science 93: 217-22210.1017/S0021859600086305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorou, M. K. Williams, B. A., Dhanoa, M. S., McAllan, A. B. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48: 185–197.10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of The Ruminant. Cornell University Press. Ithaca USA p. 272–274.10.7591/9781501732355CrossRefGoogle Scholar