Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-24T16:54:55.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physical and chemical property of some Iranian non-forage fibre sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

M. Behgar*
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School. Nuclear Science and technology Research Institute., Karaj. P. O., Box: 31485-498., Islamic Republic of Iran
R. Valizadeh
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School. Nuclear Science and technology Research Institute., Karaj. P. O., Box: 31485-498., Islamic Republic of Iran
A. A Naserian
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School. Nuclear Science and technology Research Institute., Karaj. P. O., Box: 31485-498., Islamic Republic of Iran
F. E. Shahroudi
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School. Nuclear Science and technology Research Institute., Karaj. P. O., Box: 31485-498., Islamic Republic of Iran
M. R. Nasiri
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School. Nuclear Science and technology Research Institute., Karaj. P. O., Box: 31485-498., Islamic Republic of Iran
Get access

Extract

Feed by-products are often economical sources of nutrients for use in ruminant rations. However, there are limitations regarding their usage such as high density, small particle size and in some cases, low digestibility due to high lignin contents (for by-products such as cottonseed hull, peanut hull and sunflower hull). The use of some by-products continues to increase (such as pistachio hull and cotton seed hull) although there is little data regarding their physical or chemical properties. In this study some chemical and physical properties of non-forage fibre by-products were investigated.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Journal of Dairy Science. 74: 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Giger-Reverdin, S. 2000. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 86: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Ruyet, P., Tucker, W. B., Hogue, J. F., Aslam, M., Lema, M.., Shin, I. S., Miller, T. P. and Adams, G. D. 1992. Journal of Dairy Science. 75: 2394–2408.Google Scholar
SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.0 Edition. 2002. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar