Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T12:54:50.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimisation of selection decisions in the UK Meatlinc breed of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

S. Avendaño
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK
B. Villanueva
Affiliation:
Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3JG, Scotland, UK
J.A. Woolliams
Affiliation:
Roslin Institute, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9PS, Scotland, UK
Get access

Extract

Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) estimates of breeding values (EBVs) have been routinely used for selection decisions in the UK Meatlinc (ML) population since the early nineteen nineties. This has enabled accurate selection and has allowed higher genetic gains for traits of economic relevance than in other terminal sheep breeds (MLC, 1999). However, concerns regarding increased rates of inbreeding (ΔF) by selecting exclusively on BLUP-EBVs have arisen in this small population. Dynamic rules to maximise genetic merit while ΔF is constrained to a pre-defined level using BLUP EBVs are currently available (e.g. Grundy et al 1998). They found higher gains than standard BLUP selection at the same ΔF by using these rules. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of these procedures for optimising selection decisions under constrained inbreeding in the UK ML sheep population.

Type
Poster Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

MLC, 1999. “Sheep Year Book 1999”. Meat and Livestock Comission, Milton Keynes, UK Google Scholar
Grundy, B., Villanueva, B., and Woolliams, J.A. 1998. Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genet. Res. Camb. 72: 159168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar