Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T04:30:20.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Livestock production post CAP reform: Implications for the environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

D. R. Oglethorpe*
Affiliation:
Economics, English Farming & Food Partnerships, U.K.
Get access

Extract

We now live in a Decoupled world. The direct support measures paid to farmers as part of the CAP Pillar 1 agricultural support, which paid them according to the number of livestock held or areas of crops grown, have been replaced by a Single Farm Payment (SFP). In the UK as a whole, these direct subsidy payments represented 77% of Total Income from Farming (TIFF) in 2004 and a large proportion of farmers would derive negative net farm incomes in the absence of them. In particular, livestock farmers appear to depend crucially on direct subsidies such as Suckler Cow Premium, Sheep Annual Premium and Beef Special Premium. The latest average position for LFA grazing livestock producers is that 188% of NFI is derived from subsidies and for lowland livestock producers the situation is even worse, at 259%. This suggests that if these subsidies were removed, Net farm Income would be negative and the business would be unsustainable.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)