Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T13:35:47.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interactions between ewe and lamb genotype and sucking success in neonatal lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

C. M. Dwyer
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, SAC - Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0QE, UK
A. B. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Genetics and Behavioural Sciences Department, SAC - Edinburgh, Bush Estate, Penicuik, EH26 0QE, UK
Get access

Extract

Perinatal lamb mortality remains a major economic and welfare concern in sheep farming with 80-90% of pre-weaning lamb losses occur in the immediate postnatal period (Haughey, 1993). One of the predominant factors in the death of neonatal lambs is failure of ewe-lamb bonding leading to delay or lack of sucking. Successful sucking requires the co-ordinated expression of appropriate behaviour from both the ewe and lamb. Previously we have demonstrated an interaction between ewe and lamb breed in the rate of successful sucking (Dwyer et al., 1996) with Blackface lambs having a higher rate than Suffolk lambs but also a higher rate with Suffolk ewes than with Blackface ewes. In the present study we investigated the role of ewe responses to lamb sucking attempts in determining the sucking success of neonatal lambs.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dwyer, C. M., Lawrence, A. B., Brown, H. E., & Simm, G. (1996) The effect of ewe and lamb genotype on gestation length, lambing ease and neonatal behaviour of lambs. Reprod. Fertil Devel. 8: 11231129.10.1071/RD9961123CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haughey, K.G. (1993) Perinatal lamb mortality - its investigation, causes and control. Ir. Vet. J. 46: 928.Google Scholar