Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T15:32:31.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of alternative methods to predict the lean meat percentage of pig carcasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

E Magowan*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom
M E E McCann
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom
B W Moss
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom
D Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The value of a pig carcass is largely based on its lean meat percentage (LM%). The ultimate method of accurately measuring the lean meat percentage is a full dissection of the carcass. However, this is both time consuming and expensive. Lean meat percentage prediction equations have been established for various ‘probes’ and indicator cuts. Although these prediction equations have low (less than 2.5) Root Mean Square Errors of Prediction (RMSEP) and high R_a2 values, research continues to investigate other methods to produce equations with greater accuracy and to identify alternative techniques to full dissection. The aim of this experiment was to investigate the accuracy of lean meat percentage prediction equations using data gathered from 1) grading probes, 2) primal cuts and 3) photographs from cross sections of the loin.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Walstra, P. and Merkus, G.S.M. (1996). Report ID DLO 96.014, March, p22.Google Scholar