Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T06:29:12.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Efficient ruminant production from grassland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

N D Scollan
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
J Moorby*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Ruminant production in the UK is largely dependent on grasslands: approximately 52% of UK land is (improved) grassland and rough grazing. Herbage production from improved grassland can be over five times higher than that of indigenous swards (Davies et al., 1984) and these pastures account for the majority of ruminant (meat and milk) production from grassland the UK. They are also amenable to manipulation through the choice of species, variety and mixture of forages sown. Efficiency of production can be influenced at the levels of both the plant and the animal and by the nutrition and genetics of both. This paper examines strategies to increase production efficiency based upon optimising rumen fermentation linked to plant breeding approaches. In this way efficiency can be improved without recourse to diet manipulation with supplements, which is generally impractical at grazing. Although the rumen microbial population allows the ruminant animal to extract energy from otherwise unusable sources (i.e. fibres), the rumen is also the source of greatest inefficiencies in the use of nitrogen and energy. Degraded plant nitrogen that is not captured by the rumen microbes tends to be absorbed as ammonia, much of which is excreted as urea and contributes to ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions. Similarly, methane release from the rumen represents a waste of energy that could otherwise be used for production. Globally, these two processes result in ruminant livestock accounting for approximately a third of the methane emissions (Beauchemin et al., 2008) and half of the nitrous oxide emissions (de Klein and Eckard, 2008) from anthropogenic sources.

Type
Invited Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchemin, KA, Kreuzer, M, O’Mara, F and McAllister, TA 2008. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 21–27.Google Scholar
Davies, DA, Munro, JMM and Morgan, THE 1984. Grass and Forage Science 39, 229–238.Google Scholar
de Klein, CAM and Eckard, RJ 2008. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 48, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, GR, Parsons, AJ and Rasmussen, S 2007. Proceedings of the Dairy Science Symposium, University of Melbourne, 17-21 September 2007.Google Scholar
Kingston-Smith, AH, Bollard, AL, Humphreys, MO and Theodorou, MK 2002. Annals of Botany 89, 731–740.Google Scholar
Lee, MRF, Olmos Colmenero, JdeJ, Winters, AL, Scollan, ND and Minchin, FR 2006. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 86, 1503–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorby, JM, Evans, RT, Scollan, ND, MacRae, JC and Theodorou, MK 2006. Grass and Forage Science 61, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Restrepo, CA and Barry, TN 2005. Animal Feed Science and Technology 120, 179–201.Google Scholar