Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:21:34.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of gamma irradiation on protein degradation characteristics of pea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

P. Shawrang
Affiliation:
Agricultural, Medical and Industrial Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, P.O. Box 31485-498, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran
A.A. Sadeghi*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, P.O. Box 14515.4933, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Get access

Extract

Production of field peas has been promoted in most areas of the world due to their high level of protein content as a substitute for soybean meal. The majority of the field peas are grown under contract for human consumption. Field peas must meet strict quality guidelines to enter the human market. The peas that are not eligible for human consumption are then available for livestock feed. This feed cannot be used judiciously in feeding ruminants because of their high degradability in the rumen. In highly productive ruminants, peas may not provide adequate amounts of escape protein which will necessitate supplementation of the diet with high escape protein sources. Gamma irradiation of soybean meal resulted in denaturation of proteins, increasing hydrophobicity of the protein surface and decreasing degradation of crude protein (CP) in the rumen (Shawrang et al., 2007). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of γirradiation on crude protein degradation parameters and, on the fate of true proteins of pea in the rumen.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC, 1995. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed., Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
De Boer, G., Murphy, J.J., and Kennelly, J.J.. 1987. Journal of Dairy Science. 70, 977.Google Scholar
Laemmli, U., 1970. Nature. 227, 680–689.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E.R., and McDonald, I., 1979. Journal og Agricultural Science (Cambridge). 92, 499–503.Google Scholar
SAS Institute Inc., 1996. Statistical Analysis System (SAS) User’s Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Shawrang, P., Nikkhah, A., Zareh, A., Sadeghi, A.A., Raisali, G. and Moradi, M.. 2007. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 134, 140–151.Google Scholar