Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T17:40:25.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of genotype, carcass weight and fat classification, and pelvic hanging technique on meat quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

F.O. Lively
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX. e-mailarini@dardni.gov.uk
T.W.J. Keady
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, U.K. School of Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX. e-mailarini@dardni.gov.uk
B.W. Moss
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX. e-mailarini@dardni.gov.uk
D.C. Patterson
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, U.K. School of Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX. e-mailarini@dardni.gov.uk
D.J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture and Food Science, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX. e-mailarini@dardni.gov.uk
Get access

Extract

Currently 53 and 47% of prime beef production in Northern Ireland originates from beef and dairy herds, respectively. The beef herd comprises of a diverse range of genotypes which result in major variability in carcass weights, conformation and fat classification. The present study was undertaken to investigate the effect of genotype, carcass weight and fat classification, and pelvic hanging technique on meat quality.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lively, F.O., Keady, T.W.J., Kilpatrick, D.J. and Moss, B.W. (2005). The effects of grain storage and processing method and level of feeding on meat quality of beef cattle offered two contrasting grass silages. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, April 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar