Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T06:12:17.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of feeding protected fat on dairy cow productivity and fertility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

A.I. Macrae*
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothan, United Kingdom
C.D. Penny
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothan, United Kingdom
L. Hodgson-Jones
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothan, United Kingdom
K. Aitchison
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothan, United Kingdom
S. Burton
Affiliation:
Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, Roslin, Midlothan, United Kingdom
D. Lawson
Affiliation:
Davidsons Brothers (Shotts) Ltd., Shotts, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
R. Kirkland
Affiliation:
Volac International Ltd., Royston, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
N. Grant
Affiliation:
Volac International Ltd., Royston, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Rumen protected fats are often included in dairy cow rations in order to increase the energy density of the ration without compromising rumen function. Various studies have examined the effects of protected fats, with some studies reporting an improvement in various fertility parameters (McNamara et al., 2003). This study examined the effect of feeding protected fat (Megalac™) on production parameters, and on the reproductive performance of high-yielding Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle.

Type
Posters
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McNamara, S., Butler, T., Ryan, D.P., Mee, J.F., Dillon, P., O’Mara, F.P., Butler, S.T., Anglesey, D., Rath, M., Murphy, J.J. 2003. Animal Reproduction Science 79, 45–56.Google Scholar