Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T21:37:45.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of enclosure design on the behaviour of captive Ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

C. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
J.C. Litten-Brown*
Affiliation:
University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The principal method of assessing a captive animal’s welfare is by observing their behaviour and comparing it to its wild relatives (Carlstead, 1996). Enrichment often takes the form of a complex, diverse enclosure where the individual can, for example forage for food, mark its territory and maintain its physical condition which allows the lemurs to exhibit more ‘natural’ behaviours by exhibiting some control over their environment and thus maintain high welfare standards (Carlstead, 1996). Whilst previous studies suggested visitors resulted in negative behaviours in primates (Chamove et al., 1988), more recent work suggests that the presence of humans within their enclosure is a form of enrichment for ring-tailed lemurs (Simpson, 2004). The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of the ‘traditional’ versus the larger, more varied walk-through enclosure on the behaviour of ring-tailed lemurs.

Type
Theatre Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carlstead, K. 1996. In Wild Mammals in Captivity Ed Kleiman, D.G., Allen, M.E., Thompnson, K.V. and Lumpkin, S. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chamove, A.S. Hosey, G.R. and Schaetzel, P. 1988. Zoo Biology. 7, 359–369.Google Scholar
Keith-Lucas, T., White, F.J., Keith-Lucas, L. and Vick, L.G. 1999. American Journal of Primatology. 47, 15–28.Google Scholar
Simpson, L. 2004. Zoo Federation Research Newletter. 5(3), 5.Google Scholar
Spinelli, J.S. and Markowitz, H. 1985. Laboratory Animal. 14, 19–28.Google Scholar
Webster, D. 2000. International Zoo News 47/8(305) 483–491.Google Scholar