Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T07:11:14.602Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of diet processing and enzyme supplementation of wheat based diets on growing pig performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

B.P. Gill
Affiliation:
Meat and Livestock Commission, Winterhill House, Snowdon Drive, Milton Keynes MK6 1AX, United Kingdom
H. Schulze
Affiliation:
Finnfeeds International Ltd, Market House, Ailesbury Court, High Street, Marlborough SN8 1AA, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Field observations suggest an increased incidence of digestive disorders (e.g. non-specific colitis) when growing pigs are offered diets containing high levels of wheat, particularly when the diet is offered in pellet rather than in meal form. This may be due to the anti-nutritive effects of wheat non-starch polysaccharides, with the possibility that such effects are increased following diet processing. Additionally, the provocative effects of wheat on digestive disorders may involve a change in gut microbial balance, which in turn may influence the production of fermentation end products such as skatole. High skatole concentrations (> 0.2 ppm) in carcass fat can adversely influence the sensory quality of pig meat. In this study the aim was to evaluate the effect of diet processing and feed enzyme (xylanase) supplementation of wheat based diets on the performance, general health and carcass skatole levels in growing pigs.

Type
Pig Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mortensen, A. B. and Sorensen, S. E. 1984. Relationship between boar taint and skatole determined with a new analysis method. Proceedings of the 30th European Meeting of Meat Research Workers, Bristol, pp. 394396.Google Scholar