Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T15:01:40.932Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison between titanium dioxide as an inert marker and total collection in the determination of digestible energy of diets fed to pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2021

J.E. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD United Kingdom
J. Wiseman
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

Different inert markers have been employed in nutritional studies, (Kotb and Luckey, 1972). The most commonly found marker in studies involving pigs is chromic oxide (Low, 1982) although it is now apparent that many problems are associated with its use. Other metal oxides, particularly titanium dioxide, may prove to be superior alternatives but further validation of their use as markers is required, (Kotb and Luckey, 1972). In an evaluation of inert markers, (Jagger et al. 1992) it was found that, for the determination of ileal and faecal apparent digestibility values in the pig, titanium dioxide at a rate of lg/kg feed was the most suitable of those tested. However, this conclusion was drawn from results obtained from one dietary treatment only. A crucial assumption of the use of inert markers is that they move in phase with the digesta which might not be the case if components vary widely in physical characteristics, leading possibly to differential adsorption of marker. Accordingly the objective of the current experiment was an evaluation of titanium dioxide in diets representing likely extremes of levels of fat or fibrous raw materials.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1981). The Nutrient Requirements Of Pigs.Google Scholar
Jagger, S., Wiseman, J., Cole, D.J.A. and Craigon, J. 1992. Evaluation of inert markers for the determination of ileal and faecal apparent digestibility values in the pig. British Journal of Nutrition 68: 729739.10.1079/BJN19920129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotb, A.R., Luckey, T.D., 1972. Markers in Nutrition. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews 42: 813845.Google ScholarPubMed
Low, A.G., 1982. Digestibility and availability of amino acids from feedstuff's for pigs: a review. Livestock Production Science 9: 511520.10.1016/0301-6226(82)90055-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar