Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:23:11.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative analysis of wither height, body depth and ground clearance between elite, potential elite and non-achieving event horses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

T C Whitaker*
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine and Animal Science, Writtle College, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
J Seabrook
Affiliation:
Centre for Equine and Animal Science, Writtle College, Chelmsford, United Kingdom
Get access

Extract

The relative diversity in body shape and type between breeds indicates a relationship between body shape and performance. Numerous studies on the relationship between body shape and performance are reviewed by Sasstamoinen and Barrey (2000). A limited number of studies (Langlois et al, 1978) have looked at the relationship between horse height at the wither and performance. Holmstrom et al, (1990) found elite dressage and show jumping horses had a higher mean wither height than four year old quality assessed riding horses and riding school horses. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between wither height and performance in three groups of event horses, elite, potential and non-achieving. Additionally wither height is analysed via body depth and ground clearance and performance level within the three groups. The UK a world leader within the equestrian sport of eventing, currently the Olympic individual and team silver medallist winning nation.

Type
Poster presentations
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Holmstrom, M., Magnusson, L. E. and Philipsson, J. (1990) ‘Variation in conformation of Swedish Warmblood horses and conformational characteristics of elite sport horses’, Equine Veterinary Journal, 22 (3), 186-193.Google Scholar
Langlois, B., Froideveaux, J., Lamarche, L., Legault, C., Legault, P., Tassencourt, L. and Theret, M. (1978) ‘Analyse desliaisons entre la morphologie et l’aptitude au gallop, au trot et au sant d’obstacles chez le chevel. Annales de Genetique et de Selection Animale, 10, 443-474 Google Scholar
Sasstamoinen, M.T. and Barrey, E. (2000) ‘Genetics of Conformation Locomotion and Physiological Traits’ in The Genetics of the Horse (eds. Bowling, A.T and Ruvinsky, A.) Oxford, CABI International. p439-472.Google Scholar