Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:34:57.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An evaluation of a dried yeast culture on milk yield and composition in dairy cows fed grass and maize silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

S. P. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Wales Aberystwyth, Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3DF, UK
S. P. Marsh
Affiliation:
Rumenco, Stretton House, Burton on Trent, Staffordshire, DE13 0DW, UK
D. Williams
Affiliation:
University of Wales Aberystwyth, Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion, SY23 3DF, UK
Get access

Extract

There is considerable interest in the effect of dietary supplementation with probiotics or yeast cultures on dairy cow performance. Yeast cultures such as Diamond V ‘XP’ are produced by growing selected yeast strains on a semi-solid medium under stressed conditions, which are then dried. They are now used by a majority of the high yielding herds in North America (McCullough, 1995) and have been shown to have a significant effect on butterfat and protein yield with grass silage fed UK dairy cows (Rowlinson et al., 1995). The objective of this work was to evaluate the effect of feeding a yeast culture to a medium-high yielding (8,100 kg) herd of dairy cows fed a diet based on grass and maize silage.

Type
Programme
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McCullough, M.E. 1995. Current concepts in nutrition. Hoards Dairyman. W.D. Hoard and Sons Co., P.O. Box 801, Fort Atkinson, W.I. 53:538.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, P., Marsh, S. P., and Taylor, W. 1996. The influence of a dietary supplement of a dried yeast culture on milk yield and composition in dairy cows on grass silage. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar