No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2017
The in sacco technique has been successfully utilised to differentiate feedstuffs in terms of their rate and extent of degradation. However, the large initial particle losses associated with the requirement to finely divide the substrates prior to incubation and the inability of the technique to examine liquid feed supplements has led to alternative methodologies being adopted. This study examined the ability of the Reading Pressure Technique (RPT) to differentiate a number of minimally processed energy supplements, in terms of their rate of degradation.
Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 20th November 2017 - 24th February 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.