Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:15:42.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Production comparisons between farrowing crates and community farrowing systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

A.R. Rudd
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Faculty of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge. CB3 OES.
P.H. Simmins
Affiliation:
ADAS Terrington, Terrington St. Clement, King's Lynn, Norfolk. PE34 4PW.
M.T. Mendl
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge, Faculty of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Madingley Road, Cambridge. CB3 OES.
S. Malkin
Affiliation:
ADAS Terrington, Terrington St. Clement, King's Lynn, Norfolk. PE34 4PW.
Get access

Extract

The major welfare problems of farrowing accommodation concern piglet crushing, disease and weakness. The farrowing crate has been designed to prevent these piglet welfare problems. However, for the sow the restrictive nature of the farrowing crate may decrease her welfare. As studies of free-ranging pigs show, sows often choose to leave their young at intervals (Jensen et. al., 1991) and this is prevented in the conventional farrowing crate. The development of a less restrictive farrowing system might allow the sow to express behaviour similar to that seen in free-ranging conditions. The objective of this experiment was to compare the production performance of the farrowing crate with farrowing systems which allow the sow to leave her offspring.

Type
Pigs II
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jensen, P., Stangel, G. and Algers, B. (1991) Nursing and suckling behaviour of semi-naturally kept pigs during the first 10 days postpartum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 31: 195209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar