Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:07:57.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nest site choice by farrowing sows offered cubicles or parallel walls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

A M Petchey*
Affiliation:
Centre for Rural Building, Craibstone, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9TR
Get access

Extract

Freedom of movement and the opportunity to express normal behaviours are important requirements for any housing system which satisfies the welfare codes (MAFF, 1983). Intensive pig production systems generally house farrowing sows in crates to minimise the probability that piglets will be crushed. To satisfy the welfare codes there is, therefore, a need to develop a loose housing system which satisfies a multiplicity of conditions. It must give the sow unrestrained movement, allow nest building activities, provide physical protection and warm environmental conditions for the young piglets. In a previous choice trial sows sited their nests within cubicles rather than a corner or beside a straight wall (Hunt and Petchey, 1989). In another trial they were offered an arrangement of parallel walls spaced 0.55,0.95 or 1.35 m apart, most sows (0.44) chose to farrow between the 0.55 m spaced walls (Petchey, 1991). Sows making this choice (ie 0.55 m spacing) also exhibited more nest building behaviours and built significantly bigger nests (P<0.05). The trial reported here offers sows the preferred sites of the two previous trials.

Type
Joint WPSA/BSAP Sessions
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Duncan, I.J.H., 1978. The interpretation of preference tests in Animal Behaviour. Appl. Anim. Ethol. 4 : 197200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, K. A. and Petchey, A. M., 1989. Degree of enclosure preferred by sows around farrowing. Anim. Prod. 48 : 643 (Abst.).Google Scholar
MAFF, 1983. Codes of recommendations for the welfare of livestock: Pigs MAFF Publications,London.Google Scholar
Petchey, A. M., 1991. Spatial preferences of farrowing sows. Anim. Prod. 52 : 577578(Abst).Google Scholar