Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:53:01.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lifetime performance of pigs fed post-weaning diets of different levels of ideal protein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

R.M. Kay
Affiliation:
Terrington Experimental Husbandry Farm, Terrington St. Clement, King's Lynn, Norfolk PE34 4PW
B.V. Miller
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
F.J. Bourne
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, Langford, Bristol BS18 7DU
J. Gibson
Affiliation:
Parnutts Foods Limited, Sleaford, Lines NG34 9QU
Get access

Extract

Both level of feeding and dietary composition have been demonstrated to influence bacterial colonisation and diarrhoea in the weaned pig. Specifically, Bertschinger et al (1979) demonstrated that diets low in protein and energy and high in fibre content could protect the weaned pig against challenge with live pathogenic E. coli. However, pig growth was so compromised that it proved to be unsatisfactory for commercial practice. Miller et al (1984) demonstrated that a diet in which the protein (casein) had been hydrolysed to constituent amino acids or peptides, thus markedly reducing its antigenicity, also could prevent post-weaning diarrhoea and minimise associated gut changes. They therefore, suggeted that one of the factors which may contribute to the aetiology of post-weaning diarrhoea is a transient hypersensitivity to dietary antigens prior to tolerance development.

The aim of this present work was to attempt to combine these two approaches yet achieve acceptable piglet performance, the long-term aim being to design weaner diets which effectively control post-weaning diarrhoea on commercial farms without resulting in the use of antibiotics either prophylactically or therapeutically.

Type
Pig Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertschinger, H.U., Eggenberger, E. , Jucker, H. and Pfirker, H.P. Veterinary Microbiology 3 (1979) 281290.Google Scholar
Miller, B.C.., Newby, T.J., Stokes, C.R., Hampson, D.J. , Brown, P.J. and Bourne, F.J. Am. J. Vet. Res. 45 (1984) 1730.Google Scholar
Wang, T.C. and Fuller, M.F. Brit. J. Nutr. 62 (1989) 7789.Google Scholar