Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:18:25.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of the chemical composition of silage and of supplementary concentrates on rumen fermentation in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

P.A. Martin
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute , Ayr KA6 5HL
D.G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute , Ayr KA6 5HL
S. Robertson
Affiliation:
Hannah Research Institute , Ayr KA6 5HL
Get access

Extract

Extent of fermentation in the silo can, through effects on silage composition, have important consequences for milk yield and composition. However, a poor understanding of the relationships between the chemical composition and digestion characteristics of silage, and of the implications for nutrient supply, makes it difficult to predict performance and to formulate concentrates to complement silages of different types. The 2 experiments presented here were conducted to determine rumen fermentation patterns for a range of silages, representative of restricted or enhanced fermentation in the silo, when supplemented with concentrates containing a high proportion of either starch or digestible fibre.

In each experiment 8 rumen-fistulated sheep were used to compare 8 silages, each given with 2 concentrates. Each experiment was conducted as four 4x4 Latin squares, with 2 silages given with each concentrate in a single square. Silages 1-12 were prepared from perennial ryegrass swards, harvested within 2-5h of cutting, precision-chopped to a length of approximately 20 mm, and ensiled in bunker silos of 60- or 300-tonne capacity.

Type
Silage Additives
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chamberlain, Thomas & Anderson, (1983) J. agric. Sci., Camb. 101, 4758.Google Scholar