Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T08:00:44.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of a dietary supplement of protected fat on the yield and composition of milk from ewes receiving different levels of fish meal in their diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2017

M. Kovessy
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB, U.K.
J.J. Robinson
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB, U.K.
A.K. Lough
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB, U.K.
R.P. Aitken
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB, U.K.
Get access

Extract

Perez Hernandez, Robinson, Aitken and Fraser (1986) showed that the addition of a protected lipid to the diet of lactating ewes increased the fat content of their milk but had little effect on milk yield. The effects on milk composition were reflected in an improvement of approximately 10 per cent in lamb growth rate. In the experiments of Perez Hernandez et al. the response to the lipid supplement was tested using a diet with a high content of undegraded dietary protein. We now report the results of an experiment in which the response of lactating ewes to a ‘protected’ lipid was tested at three levels of protein intake. We also present data from a second experiment carried out to investigate the influence of the ‘protected’ lipid on the fatty acid composition of the ewe's milk.

Type
Sheep Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gander, C.W., Jensen, R.G. and Sampugna, J. (1962). Journal of Dairy Science 45, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez Hernandez, M., Robinson, J.J., Aitken, R.P. and Fraser, C. (1986). Animal Production 42, 455.Google Scholar