Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:02:37.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contribution of palatability to differences in the intake of ground and pelleted roughages by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2017

F. D. DeB Hovell
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
D. V. Rayner
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
D. J. Kyle
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
S. J. Miller
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
G. H. Clark
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB581 King Street, Aberdeen AB9 1UD
Get access

Extract

Previous studies have shown a good correlation between the degradation characteristics of roughages as measured by the in sacco nylon bag technique, and their voluntary intake by sheep (Hovell et al. 1986), and cattle (Wheeler et al. 1979; Ørskov et al. 1988). The greater intakes of better roughages are associated with a greater outflow of undegraded residues from the rumen. We have also found that even when the roughages were ground to a particle size small enough to leave the rumen without further comminution, the differences in intake between good and poor remained. Thus the differences in intake were not entirely due to material degraded in the rumen, but were associated with differences in the outflow of undegraded residues from the rumen, and therefore some animal factor appeared to be involved. The greater outflow of undegraded residues of the more degradable roughages appeared not to be mediated by the contractile behaviour of the reticulo-rumen (Hovell et al. 1987; 1988).

Type
Ruminant Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © British Society of Animal Production 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hovell, F.D.DeB., Ngambi, J.W.W., Barber, W.P. and Kyle, D.J. (1986). The voluntary intake of hay by sheep in relation to its digestibility in the rumen as measured in nylon bags. Animal Production, 42, 111118.Google Scholar
Hovell, F.D.DeB., Campos-Arceu, R. and Kyle, D.J., D.J., (1987). The effect of grinding and pelleting of roughages of known degradability on voluntary intake and digestibility by sheep. Animal Production, 44, 476 Ast 57.Google Scholar
Hovell, F.D. DeB., Masvaure, S.M., Gregory, P.C. and Kyle, D.J. (1988). The effect of roughage quality on intake, digestion and rumen function in sheep. Animal Production, 46, 506, Abst 77.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E.R., Reid, G.W. and Kay, M. (1988). Prediction of intake by cattle from degradation characteristics of roughages. Animal Production, 46, 2934.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W.E., Dinius, D.A. and Coombe, J.B. (1979). Digestibility, rate of digestion and rumino reticual parameters of beef steers fed low-quality roughages. Journal of Animal Science, 49, 13571363.Google Scholar