Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-20T00:44:28.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The roles of feeding regime, housing and Individuals' characteristics in the development of stereotypic behaviour in pregnant gilts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

E.M.C. Terlouw
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture , West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
A.B Lawrence
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture , West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
A.W Illius
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture , West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
Get access

Extract

It has recently been shown that stereotypies In tethered sows are reduced at high feeding levels, Indicating that feeding level may be a major factor in the development of stereotypies (Appleby and Lawrence, 1987). It has also been suggested that the restraint of tethering Itself Is a major source of stress for the sow, thus promoting the development of stereotypies. The exact role of both factors of feeding level and restraint on the development of stereotypies have not yet been studied separately.

Differences in experimental environments and genotypes may explain part of the large variability in levels stereotypies previously observed in tethered sows across experiments. Differences in stereotyped activities between sows of the same genotype within experiments must, however, be explained by individual differences In sows’ behavioural and neurological profiles.

The present experiment investigated the role of restraint and feeding level on the development of stereotypies in pregnant gilts. Secondly it Investigated social temperament as a factor reflecting the gilts’ predisposition to develop certain abnormal behaviours.

Type
Pig Production
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Production 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appleby, M.C. and Lawrence, A.B. 1987. Animal Production 45: 103110.Google Scholar
Hunter, E.J., Broom, D.M., Edwards, S.A. and Sibly, R.M. 1988. Animal Production, 47: 139148.Google Scholar
Lawrence, A B, Teriouw, E M C and illlus, A W 1989. Animal Production, 48: 644.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, V. and Relnhardt, A. 1975. Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie 38: 315323.Google Scholar