Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:32:02.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was Hamdan v. Rumsfeld an Exercise in Judicial Futility?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Jide Nzelibe
Jide Nzelibe*
Affiliation:
Northwestern University Law School
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Supreme Court and the War on Terrorism
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 101 , 2007 , pp. 345 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 126 S.Ct. 2749 (2006).

2 See, e.g., Flaherty, Martin S. More Real Than Apparent: Separation of Powers, the Rule of Law, and Comparative Executive “Creativity” in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 2006 Cato Sup. Ct. Rev. 51 Google Scholar, 51 (“Rarely has the Supreme Court handed a ‘wartime’ president a greater defeat, or human rights defenders a greater victory.”).

3 See, e.g., Ku, Julian & Yoo, John, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld: The Functional Case for Foreign Affairs Deference to the Executive Branch, 23 Const. Comment. 179 (2006)Google Scholar (criticizing the decision as a break from past court precedents deferring to the executive branch in foreign affairs).

4 See, e.g., Walter Dellinger, A Supreme Court Conversation, Slate, June 29, 2006, available at <http://www.sla-te.com/id/2144476/entry/2144825/>.

5 476 F.3d 981 (2007).

6 Pub. L. No. 109-366, 120 Stat. 2600 (2006).

7 Stoli, Richard J. The Sound of the Guns: Is there a Congressional Rally Effect After U.S. Military Action?, 15 Am. Pol. Q. 223, 224-25 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar (discussing the rally effect and showing that it affects members of Congress).

8 See Howell, William G. & Pevehouse, Jon C. Presidents, Congress, and the Use of Force, 59 Int’L Org. 209 (2005)Google Scholar.

9 Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944).

10 Id. at 242-48 (Jackson, J., dissenting).