Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T03:16:18.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remedies and Retaliation in the WTO: are They Likely to Be Effective? The State Perspective and the Company Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Pieter Jan Kuyper
Pieter Jan Kuyper*
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Process, Compliance and Implementation Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 91 , 1997 , pp. 282 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. § 2401 et seq.) provides authority for the U.S. government to investigate whether other governments are violating commitments under trade agreements. Among other things, Section 301 requires a unilateral decision by the U.S. if the multilateral dispute system has not reached a decision within twelve months.