Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:01:08.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks by Sir Nigel Rodley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Nigel Rodley*
Affiliation:
University of Essex; and of the UN Human Rights Committee

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Consular Rights and the Death Penalty After LaGrand
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 GA Res. 2857 (XXVI), Dec. 20, 1971, UN Gaor, 26th Sess., Supp. No. 29, at 94; also GA Res. 32/61, Dec. 8, 1977, UN Gaor, 32nd Sess., Supp. No. 45, at 136.

2 See descriptions of proceedings of the sixth and eighth quinquennial U.N. Congresses on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of offenders in Nigel S. Rodley, the Treatment of Prisoners Under International Law 208-09 (1999).

3 Soering v. United Kingdom, 161 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) (1989).

4 European Parliament Resolution of 2 April 1998 on Human Rights: Death Penalty in the United States, OJ C138/1998, at 176 (May 4, 1998); Resolution of 13 April 2000 on Human Rights: Death Penalty in the United States, OJ C040/2001, at 423 (Feb. 7, 2001); Resolution of 6 July 2000 on Human Rights: Death Penalty in the United States, OJ C121/2001, at 403 (April 24, 2001).

5 Council of European Union Doc. 9199/98.

6 Presidency Statement 5878/99 (Press 34), Feb. 11, 1999.

7 Presidency Statement 5834/00 (Press 25), Feb. 8, 2000.

8 Council of Europe press release, June 27, 2001.