No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Remarks by Kenneth Keith
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2017
Abstract
![Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'](https://static.cambridge.org/content/id/urn%3Acambridge.org%3Aid%3Aarticle%3AS0272503700046759/resource/name/firstPage-S0272503700046759a.jpg)
- Type
- The Future of Alien Tort Litigation: Kiobel and Beyond
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012
References
1 Friendly, Henry J., Benchmarks: Selected Papers by an Eminent Federal Judge 196, 202 (1967)Google Scholar.
2 I would mention in that context another splendid publication by the Hudson medalist of yesterday, James Crawford, entitled Australian Courts of Law.
3 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
4 11 U.S. 116(1812).
5 Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Ger. v. It.; Greece intervening), Judgment, (Feb. 3, 2012), available at http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/143/16883.pdf.
6 Id. para. 52.
7 Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosn. & Herz. v. Serb. & Montenegro), 2007 I.C.J. 43, paras. 170-74 (Feb. 26).
8 R v Maf art & Prieur, 74 ILR 241; UN Secretary-General, Ruling on the Rainbow Warrior Affair Between France and New Zealand (July 6, 1986), 19 R.I.A.A. 199 (1986), 26 I.L.M. 1346; Case Concerning the Difference Between New Zealand and France Concerning the Interpretation or Application of Two Agreements, Concluded on 9 July 1986 Between the Two States and Which Related to the Problems Arising from the Rainbow Warrior Affair (N.Z. v. Fr.), 20 R.I.A.A. 216 (1990).
9 156 Recueil des Cours 1 (1984), referring to his lectures of 20 years earlier.
10 Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004).
11 United States v. Smith, 18 U.S. 153 (1820) (showing a divided Supreme Court on the (non) specificity ofthat definition).