Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:06:52.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Ingrid Wuerth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Ingrid Wuerth
Ingrid Wuerth*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Future of Alien Tort Litigation: Kiobel and Beyond
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 106 , 2012 , pp. 490 - 492
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See, e.g., Buttfield v. Stranahan, 192 U.S. 470 (1904); United States v. Clark, 435 F.3d 1100 (9th Cir. 2006).

2 Eeoc v. Arabian American Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1991) (quoting Foley Bros. Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281, 284-85 (1949)).

3 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010).

4 Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 2004 WL 182581 *46-50 (Brief of the United States).

5 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 2012 WL 259389 *54 (Brief for Respondents).

6 542 U.S. 692 (2004).

7 See Bellia, Anthony J. Jr. & Clark, Bradford R., The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations, 78 U. Chi. L. Rev. 445 (2011)Google Scholar; Bradley, Curtis A., The Alien Tort Statute and Article III, 42 Va. J. Int’l L. 587, 630-31 (2002)Google Scholar.

8 See Wuerth, Ingrid, The Alien Tort Statute and Federal Common Law: A New Approach, 85 Notre Dame L. Rev. 1931, 1967-71 (2010)Google Scholar.

9 Sosa, supra note 6, at 761-63 (Bryer, J., concurring).

10 Langer, Maximo, The Diplomacy of Universal Jurisdiction, 105 AJIL 1 (2011)Google Scholar.

11 See Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Dem. Rep. Congo v. Belg.), 2002 I.C.J. 3 (Feb. 14) (separate opinion of Judges Higgins, Kooijmans, & Buergenthal); Jones v. Saudi Arabia, 2006 U.K.H.L. 26, at para. 20 (opinion of Lord Bingham); Cleveland, Sarah H., The Alien Tort Statute, Civil Society, and Corporate Responsibility, 56 Rutgers L. Rev. 971, 975-80 (2004)Google Scholar.

12 Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764 (1993) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

13 Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Pet. Co., Transcript of Oral Argument at 8, available at http://www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/10-1491.pdf.

14 See Donovan, Donald Francis & Roberts, Anthea, The Emerging Recognition of Universal Civil Jurisdiction, 100 AJIL 142, 157-59 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.