Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T06:16:22.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks by Eric Stein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Eric Stein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Law in Domestic Legal Orders: A Comparative Perspective
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 91 , 1997 , pp. 301
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For more detailed analyses, see Iwasawa, Yuji, Effectuation of International Law in the Municipal Order of Japan, 4 Asian Y. B. Int’l L. 143 (1995)Google Scholar; Iwasawa, Yuji, The Relationship between International Law and National Law: Japanese Experiences, 63 Brit. Y. B. Int’l L. 333 (1993)Google Scholar.

2 46 Kõmlnshü 43 (Tokyo High Ct., June 23, 1993), summarized in English in 14 Waseda Bull. Comp. L. 58 (1993).

3 General Comment 17 (Art. 24, 1989), reproduced in Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, UN. Doc. HRI/GEN/l/Rev.3, at 21 (1997) [hereinafter Compilation of General Comments].

4 E.g., Nobuyoshi Ashibe, Kenpōgaku 1: Kenpō Sōron [A Study of Constitutional Law I: General Discussion] 90 (1992).

5 20 Gyōsaishü 28 (Tokyo Dist. Ct., Jan. 25, 1969), translated and reprinted in 14 Japanese Ann. Int’l L. 146 (1970).

6 See Kazuo Yamanouchi, Seifu No Kenpō Kaishaku [Interpretations of the Constitution by the Government] 247-48 (1965).

7 13 Keishū 3225 (Sup. Ct., Dec. 16, 1959), translated and reprinted in 4 Japanese Ann. Int’l L. 103 (1960), 32 Int’l L. Rep. 43.

8 Kenpō, art. 98(2).

9 E.g., Gaikokujin Hanzai Saibanreishū [Judicial Cases on Crimes by Aliens] 55 (Ministry of Justice Criminal Affairs Bureau ed. 1994) (Tokyo High Court, Feb. 3, 1993) (ICCPR); 466 Rōdō Hanrei 65 (Tokyo High Ct., Nov. 20, 1985) (views of ILO organs); not yet reported (Tokyo Dist. Ct., Nov. 22, 1996) (ILO Convention No. 29); 36 Hanrei Jihŏ 36 (Tokyo Dist. Ct., Apr. 18, 1989), translated and reprinted in 32 Japanese Ann. Int’l L. 125 (1989), 29 I.L.M. 391 (1990) (customary international law).

10 Yuji Iwasawa, Jōyaku no Kokunai Tekiyō KanosōI: Iwayuru “Self-Executing” Na Jōyaku Ni Kansuru kansuru Ichi Kōsatsu [Domestic Applicability of Treaties: What Are “Self-Executing” Treaties?] (1985); see also Iwasawa, Yuji, The Doctrine of Self-Executing Treaties in the United States: A Critical Analysis, 26 VA. J. Int’l L. 627 (1986)Google Scholar.

11 40 Shōmu Geppō 2029 (Tokyo High Ct., Mar. 5, 1993), translated and reprinted in 37 Japanese Ann. Int’l L. 129 (1994).

12 Judicial Cases on Crimes by Aliens, supra note 7.

13 35 Gyōsaishō 2220 (Osaka High Ct., Dec. 19, 1984).

14 Id.

15 35 Shōmu Geppō 1754 (Sup. Ct., Mar. 2, 1989).

16 Compilation of General Comments, supra note 3, at 61.

17 31 Shōmu Geppō 207 (Kyoto Dist. Ct, June 29, 1984).

18 E.g., Paust, Jordan J., Remarks, Jurisdiction in Human Rights Cases: Is the Tel-Oren Case a Step Backward?, 79 Proc. Am. Soc’y Int’l L. 361, 364 (1985)Google Scholar.

19 E.g., Rudolf Geiger, Grundgesetz Und Völkerrecht 166-67, 174-77 (2d ed. 1994).

20 40 Shōmu Geppō 2029 (Tokyo High Ct., Mar. 5, 1993), translated and reprinted in 37 Japanese Ann. Int’l L. 129 (1989).

21 43 Minshō 89, 98 (Sup. Ct., Mar. 8, 1989), translated and reprinted in 22 Law in Japan 29 ( 1989).

22 1597 Hanrei Jihō 115 (Tokushima Dist. Ct., Mar. 15, 1996).