Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T01:58:27.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relational Sovereignty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Helen Stacy*
Affiliation:
Stanford Institute for International Studies; Lecturer, Stanford Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Sovereignty: Essential, Variegated, Or Irrelevant?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Helen Stacy, Relational Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention, in Enthics, Law, and the International Fight against Terrorism, (Steven Lee ed., forthcoming).

2 The Independent International Commissionon Kosovo, The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned 190 (2000).

3 The “Annan Doctrine” relates to the loss of the traditional prerogatives of sovereignty in the face of crimes against humanity. For more on the UN actions regarding East Timor, see Annual Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization, U.N. GAOR, 54th Sess., Supp. 1, UN Doc. A/54/1 (1999); and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Speech to the General Assembly of the United Nations (Sept. 20, 1999), available at .http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N99/858/23/PDF/N9985823.pdf?OpenElement