Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T20:04:52.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral Disagreement, Sovereign Authority, and the Limits to Extraterritorial Prosecution of Human Rights Violators*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Brad R. Roth
Brad R. Roth*
Affiliation:
Wayne State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Principle of Legality in International Criminal Law
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 103 , 2009 , pp. 109 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This paper is an abstract of Coming to Terms with Ruthlessness: Sovereign Equality, Global Pluralism, and the Limits of International Criminal Justice, 8 Santa Clara J. Int’l L. 231 (2010).

References

1 For contrasting perspectives on the tendency toward such gap-filling in international criminal law, see Schaack, Beth Van, Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals, 97 Geo. L. J. 119 (2008)Google Scholar; Robinson, Darryl, The Identity Crisis of International Criminal Law 21 Leiden J. Int’l L. 925 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.