Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T05:03:44.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lecture Commentary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Andrew Jacovides
Andrew Jacovides*
Affiliation:
Former Ambassador of Cyprus to the United States; Ambassador/Permanent Representative to the United Nations
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Great Expectations: Where Does the Proliferation of International Dispute Resolution Tribunals Leave International Law?
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 96 , 2002 , pp. 231 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 All these references to “relations” reminds me of the contrast, until recently, in the United States Congress of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The reason for the distinction, it was said, was that Senators were too old to have affairs, they only had relations! This, as we well know, in reality has not always been the case. . . .

2 James Wolfensohn, Building an Equitable World, at the Annual Meeting of the Board of Governors of the International Monetary Fund and die World Bank (Sept. 26, 2000).

3 Convention on the Law of the Sea, Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 UNTS 397.

4 Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, July 17, 1998, 37 ILM. 999 (1998).

5 Leigh, Monroe, The United States and the Rome Statute, 95 AJIL 124 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Treaties Conflicting with Peremptory Norms of International Law and the Zurich-London Agreements, Nicosia (1966): Law of Treaties, Official Records of United Nations Conference 1968-89, Jus Cogens, Outlines on selected topics of international law, UN Doc. A/CN.4/454, Nov. 9, 1993, at 16-26. see also United Nations, International Law on the Eve of the Twenty-First Century: Views from the International Law Commission, 69-78 (1997).

7 UN Charter Art. 2(4).

8 UN Charter Art. 51.

9 Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, The Responsióne to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2001).

10 SC Res. 1368 (Sept. 12, 2001).

11 SC Res. 1373 (Sept. 28, 2001).

12 Convention on the Seulement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States, 4 ILM. 532 (1965), available at <http://www.worldbank.Org/icsid/basicdoc/9.htm>.

13 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, June 10, 1958, 21 UST 2517, 330 UNTS 38 (1970).

14 Reed, Lucy, Great Expectations: Where Does the Proliferation of International Dispute Resolution Tribunals Leave International Law? 96 ASIL Proc. 217 (2002)Google Scholar.

15 Guillaume, Judge Gilbert, The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Outlook for the International Legal Order, Speech to the Sixth Committee of the General Assembly of the United Nations (2000)Google Scholar, available at <http://www.icj.cij.oig/icjwww/ipresscom/SPEECHES/iSpeechPresident_Guillaume_SixthCommittee_20001027.htm>. See also, Alford, Roger, The Proliferation of International Courts and Tribunals: International Adjudication in Ascendence, 94 ASIL Proc. 160 (2000)Google Scholar; Romano, Cesare P. R., The Proliferation of International Judicial Bodies: The Pieces of the Puzzle, 31 N.Y.U.J. Int’ l L & Pol. 709 (1999)Google Scholar.

16 Guillaume, supra note 10.

17 Loizidou v. Turkey, 310 Eur. Ct. H.R. (ser. A) (1995).

18 Southern Bluefin Tuna Cases (N.Z. v. Japan, Austl. v. Japan), Provisional Measures (1999), available at <http://www.itlos.org>.

19 Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, Feb. 1, 1995, 34 ILM. 351 (1995).

20 Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts Inc., 717 F. Supp. 1374 (S.D. Ind. 1989).

21 [UNESCO] Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, Nov. 14, 1970, 823 UNTS 231 (1972), reprinted in 10 ILM 289 (1970).

22 See, e.g., Jacovides, Andrew, International Law in International Diplomacy, 77 ASIL Proc. 100-02 (1983)Google Scholar.

23 See, e.g., The Permanent Court of Arbitration, The 1999PCA Seminar (forthcoming).

24 Glaberson, William, U.S. Courts Become Arbiters of Global Rights and Wrongs , N.Y. Times, at A1 (June 21, 2001)Google Scholar.

25 A Nation Challenged: The Victims; 7 Families Sue bin Laden and Others for Billions, N.Y. Times, at All (Feb 20, 2002).