Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:32:55.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finding, Verifying, and Curating Human Rights Facts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Margaret Satterthwaite
Margaret Satterthwaite*
Affiliation:
Professor of Clinical Law, New York University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Future of Human Rights Fact-Finding
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 107 , 2013 , pp. 62 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 While the concept of “naming and shaming” is certainly under-inclusive of what human rights advocates do, it is widely used to describe the documentation and publication strategies of major NGOs. See, e.g., Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Sticks and Stones: Naming and Shaming and the Human Rights Enforcement Problem, 62 Int’l Org. 689 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Gready, Paul, Telling Truth? The Methodological Challenges of Truth Commissions, in Methods of Human Rights Research 159–85, 160 (Coomans, Fons, Granfeld, Fred & Kamminga, Menno T. eds., 2009)Google Scholar.

3 Wilson, Richard, Representing Human Rights Violations: Social Contexts and Subjectivities, in Human Rights, Culture & Context: Anthropological Perspectives 134–60 (1997)Google Scholar.

4 See Gready, Paul, Introduction: “Responsibility to the Story,” 2 J. Hum. Rts. Prac. 177 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Navanethem Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Human Rights Investigations and Their Methodology (Feb. 24, 2010), at http://unispal.un.Org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/C9222F058467E6F6852576D500574710.

6 For a discussion of the dangers of professionalization for the human rights field, see Kennedy, David, The International Human Rights Regime: Still Part of the Problem?, in Examining Critical Perspectives on Human Rights 19–34 (Dickinson, Rob, Katselli, Elena, Murray, Colin & Pedersen, Ole W. eds., 2012)Google Scholar.

7 For example, see Steinberg, Gerald M., Herzberg, Anne & Berman, Jordan, The Need for Standardized Fact-Finding Methodology, in Steinberg, Gerald M., Herzberg, Anne & Berman, Jordan, Best Practices for Human Rights and Humanitarian NGO Fact-Finding 3–19 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 For example, see Guidelines on International Human Rights Fact-Finding Visits and Reports: The Lund-London Guidelines (June 1, 2009), http://www.factfindingguidelines.org/.

9 Langford, Malcolm & Fukuda-Parr, Sakiko, The Turn to Metrics, 30 Nordic J. Hum. Rts. 222, 223 (2012)Google Scholar.

10 See United Nations, Manual on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-Legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions, U.N. DOC. E/ST/CSDHA/.12 (1991).

11 Id.

12 Nancy Combs, Fact-Finding Without Facts: The Uncertain Evidentiary Foundations of International Criminal Convictions 7 (2010).

13 Id. at 12.

14 Id. at 13–14.