Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T00:28:17.658Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The EC’s Common Commerical Policy: Which Way the Swing of the Pendulum?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Pieter Jan Kuyper*
Affiliation:
Commission of the European Communities

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Future of the President's Authority to Negotiate International Trade Agreements after NAFTA and the Uruguay Round: What Should Congress Delegate?
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1994 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Paper was presented, in his absence, by Jonathan Davidson, Delegation of the Commission of the European Communities, Washington.

References

1 We persist in using the term European “Community” rather than European “Union” because the Union has no international personality and this paper is concerned with the international competences of the Community.

2 See Council Regs. 518 of March 1994, OJ. L 67/77 ff

3 Council Reg. 521/94 of 7 March 1994, OJ. L 66/7.

4 Council Reg. 522/94, OJ. L 66/10.

5 Council Reg. 520/94, OJ. L 66/1.

6 Cf. Louis Henkin, Foreign Affairs And The Constitution 234; Opinion 1/75 (1975) ECR 2187.

7 See, inter alia, Opinion 1/78 [1979], ECR 2871, points 45 ff., and Case 45/86 (Commission v. Council) [1987] ECR, 2671, points 16-21 and Case 6-62/88 (Greece v. Commission) [1990] ECR, 1-1527.

8 See I. M. Destler, American Trade Politics (2d ed.) 73 ff. (1992).