Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:02:40.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domestic Courts and Global Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Christopher A. Whytock
Christopher A. Whytock*
Affiliation:
University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law; Duke University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Institutions and the Rule of Law: A New Voices Panel
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 101 , 2007 , pp. 166 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Buxbaum, Hannah L. Transnational Regulatory Litigation, 46 Va. J. Int’l L. 251 (2006)Google Scholar.

2 Wai, Robert, Transnational Private Litigation and Transnational Governance, in Criticizing Global Governance 243-61 (Lederer, Markus & Müller, Philipp S. eds., 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 Miles Kahler, Global Governance Redefined 3 (Oct. 2004) (unpublished manuscript, available at <http://irpshome.ucsd.edu/faculty/mkahler/GlobGov_10.04.doc>).

4 Cooter, Robert & Marks, Stephen with Mnookin, Robert, Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: A Testable Model of Strategic Behavior, 11 J. Legal Stud. 225 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 See, e.g., Philip C. Jessup, Transnational Law (1956).

6 An important exception is Tonya Putnam’s work on the extraterritorial application of U.S. regulations by U.S. courts.

7 See Pound, Roscoe, Law in Boob and Law in Action, 44 Am. L. Rev. 12 (1910)Google Scholar.

8 I suspect that judges are more likely to publish decisions granting motions to dismiss on forum non conveniens grounds than decisions denying them, and that the actual dismissal rate therefore may be lower.

9 See Anne-Marie Slaughter, A New World Order (2004) (discussing “judicial comity”).

10 Burley, Anne-Marie, Law Among Liberal States: Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine, 92 Colum. L. Rev. 1907, 1917-21 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.