Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T18:17:18.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

J. Ashley Roach
J. Ashley Roach*
Affiliation:
JAGC, U.S. Navy; International Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General, Department of the Navy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Protocols Additional to the Geneva Conventions on the Laws of War
Information
Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting , Volume 74 , 1980 , pp. 205 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 International Law–The Conduct of Armed Conflict and Air Operations, AFP 110-31, para. 10-7, page 10-3 et seq. (1976).

* Department of Government, Georgetown University.

2 The Law of Land Warfare, FM 27-10, para. 497, pp. 177-78 (1956).

3 Grand Strategy: September 1939-June 1941, at 165-71,182, 551-52 (J.R.M. Butler, ed. 1957).

* Major, Canadian Department of National Defense, Chief International Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General. Member of the Canadian Delegation to the UN Conference on Certain Conventional Weapons.

4 The United Kingdom statement reads “in relation to Article I, that the term ‘armed conflict’ of itself and in its context implies a certain level of intensity of military operations which must be present before the Conventions or the Protocol are to apply to any given situation, and that this level of intensity cannot be less than that required for the application of Protocol II, by virtue of Article 1 of the Protocol, to internal conflicts.” DA Pam 27-1-1, at 140.

* Library of Congress.

** Presently free lance writer. Formerly with the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Department of the Army and member of the U.S. Delegation to the Diplomatic Conference on Humanitarian Law. 5 Kalshoven, Remarks in “The New Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflict,” Report of the International Symposium of the Netherlands Red Cross on the Protocols of 1977 Additional to the Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, The Hague, 25-26 September 1978, at page 33.