Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T05:43:59.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Confronting Complexities in Fact-Finding and the Nature of Investor-State Arbitration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Lucy Reed*
Affiliation:
Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer U.S. LLP

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Fact-Finding in Interstate Disputes
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Corfu Channel (U.K. v. Albania), Judgment on the Merits, 1949 I.C.J. 4 (Judgment of 25 March 1948).

2 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Against Nicaragua (Nicar. v. U.S.), Judgment, 1984 I.C.J. 392 (Nov. 26).

3 Uncitral Award (Nov. 30, 2011).

4 ICSID Case No. ARB/04/13, Award (Nov. 6, 2008).

5 See, e.g., Bayindir v. Pakistan, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/29, Award (Aug. 27, 2009); Rumeli v. Kazakhstan, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/16, Award (July 29, 2008).

6 Corfu Channel, supra note 1, at 18.

7 Id. at 21 (emphasis added).

8 Bayindir v. Pakistan, supra note 5, para. 141.

9 Id. para. 239.

10 Id. para. 141 (citing Corfu Channel, supra note 1, at 18).

11 UNCITRAL/NAFTA Chapter 11 Award, para. 41 (Aug. 3, 2005).

12 Id. para. 41.

13 3 L. & Prac. Int’l. Cts. & Tribunals 1-35 (2004).