Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T08:22:14.090Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Claims of Victims of Terrorism Against Foreign States in U.S. Courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Ronald J. Bettauer*
Affiliation:
U.S. State Department, George Washington University Law School

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The Law and Politics of Foreign Sovereign Immunity
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Burns H. Weston, Richard B. Lillich, & David J. Bederman, International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump Sum Agreements, 1975-1995 (1999); Richard B. Lillich & Burns H. Weston, International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump Sum Agreements (1975).

2 Pub. L. No. 96-606 (Dec. 28, 1980), adding title VII to the International Claims Settlement Act, 22 U.S.C. 1621, 1645-16450.

3 16 UST 140, TIAS 5773, 34 I.L.M. 685 (1995).

4 See United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324 (1937); United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (1942).

5 Princz v. Federal Republic of Germany, 26 F.3d 1166 (1994).

6 35 I.L.M. 193 (1996). The supplementary agreement entered into force on January 25, 1999.

7 United States v. Belmont, 301 U.S. 324 (1937).

8 United States v. Pink, 315 U.S. 203 (1942).

9 11 Bevans 1248, 1933 U.S.T. Lexis 59.

10 Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654 (1981).

11 Reprinted in Caron, David D. & Crook, John R., editors, The Iran-United States Claims Tribunal and the Process of International Claims Resolution 373 (2000)Google Scholar.

13 S. 1275, 108th Cong., 1st Sess. (2003). See Hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Benefits for U. S. Victims of International Terrorism, 108th Cong., 1 Sess. (2003), available at <http://www.terrorisminfo.mipt.org/pdf/s-hrg108-214.pdf>.

14 See Sommer, Hillel, Providing Compensation for Harm Caused by Terrorism: Lessons Learned in the Israeli Experience, 36 Ind. L. Rev. 335 (2003)Google Scholar.

15 See TIAS 12030 (1989).

16 See Schwartz, Jonathan B., Dealing with a “Rogue State “: The Libya Precedent, 101 AJIL 553, 568-570 (2007)Google Scholar.

17 Pugh v. Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 2008 U.S. Dist LEXIS 4290 (D.C. D.C. Jan. 23, 2008).

18 See Remarks by the President on February 26, 1996, 32 Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 381 (1996)(although the president proposed Congress pass legislation to vest Cuban assets to provide compensation, the Administration subsequently decided to vest assets without new legislation under the authority of section 5 the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, 50 U.S.C, app. 5 and 12 U.S.C. 95a).

19 Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1966, Pub. L. No. 104-132 § 221 (1996)(inserted new subsection (a)(7) into 28 U.S.C. 1605).

20 See generally U.S. Congressional Research Service, Suits Against Terrorist States by Victims of Terrorism (2005).

21 Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act of 2000, Pub. L. No. 106-386 § 2002 (2000).

22 Terrorism Risk Insurance Act, Pub. L. No. 107-297 § 201 (2002).

24 Id.

25 National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-181 § 1083 (2O08)(replacing 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(7) with a new section 1605A and making other changes).

26 Presidential Determination No. 2008-9, January 28, 2008, Weekly Comp. Pres. Doc. 116-117, available at <http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2008/01/20080128-ll.html>. See also <http://www.whitehouse.gov/ne ws/releases/2008/01/20080128-12.html>.

27 In re Iraq, Petition for a Writ of Certiorari filed Feb. 19, 2008 (No. 07-1090).

28 See Memorandum of Law in Support of Bank Melli’s Motion to Dismiss in Weinstein v. Iran, Case No. 05-Misc-235 (E.D.N.Y.Xpending).

29 Id.