Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T12:15:59.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chair: Anne Bayefsky

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Anne Bayefsky*
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Human Rights: Implementation through the UN System
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Of those states allowing individual complaints in the context of the primary procedure of the Optional Protocol to the Civil and Political Covenant, 44 percent have never been the subject of even one complaint. In the past five years, an average of only forty-three cases per year have even been registered from eighty-one states having a combined population of one billion people.

2 Frequently these include such reservations as those recently made to the Convention on the Rights of the Child by Malaysia: “The Government... expresses reservations with respect to Article 1, 2, 7, 13, 14, 15, 22, 28, 37, 40, para. 3 and 4, 44, 45 . .. and declares that the said provisions shall be applicable only if they are in conformity with the Constitution, national laws and national policies of the Government of Malaysia.”

3 Special Rapporteurs or Representatives or Experts with a country-specific mandate can also arise from outside the 1503 context. Totalling the number of country-specific procedures that are currently in existence, they are directed at only twenty-two of the 184 UN member states.